[EM] Visualizations of Plurality, Hare, Approval, and Condorcet
simmonfo at up.edu
Thu Apr 20 12:44:23 PDT 2006
Wow! Great idea. If IRV is so pathological under the best of circumstances, then imagine what could happen when the going gets rough (multi-modal distributions of voters, etc.).
Interesting how close Condorcet and
From: Ka-Ping Yee <election-methods at zesty.ca>
Subject: [EM] Visualizations of Plurality, Hare, Approval, and
To: election-methods at electorama.com
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0604200659440.13587 at server1.LFW.org>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
I'm new here and hope to learn from others on this list. Thank you
for indulging me with this request for feedback.
I did some simulations of Plurality, Approval, Hare, and Condorcet
methods (under certain simplifying assumptions) and produced
visualizations of the results, which are posted at:
I'm curious what you all think of this. I was already skeptical of
the Hare method but the results surprised even me -- are they
surprising to you?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 4528 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Election-Methods