[EM] Citation for immunity to strategic voting?
juho4880 at yahoo.co.uk
Sat Sep 3 02:58:05 PDT 2005
What would you say about the truth value of a one step more modest
claim "Condorcet methods are immune to strategic voting when there is
no top level loop and modified votes do not generate one"?
On Sep 3, 2005, at 05:40, Andrew Myers wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm writing a short paper on secure implementations of Condorcet
> I would like to claim that Condorcet methods are immune to strategic
> voting when there is a Condorcet winner (that is, voters cannot improve
> the election result from their perspective by voting insincerely). Is
> an appropriate paper to cite that makes this argument clearly? Thanks
> -- Andrew
> Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list
More information about the Election-Methods