[EM] Citation for immunity to strategic voting?

[Juho Laatu]

Hi All,

What would you say about the truth value of a one step more modest 
claim "Condorcet methods are immune to strategic voting when there is 
no top level loop and modified votes do not generate one"?

BR, Juho


On Sep 3, 2005, at 05:40, Andrew Myers wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'm writing a short paper on secure implementations of Condorcet 
> voting.
> I would like to claim that Condorcet methods are immune to strategic
> voting when there is a Condorcet winner (that is, voters cannot improve
> the election result from their perspective by voting insincerely). Is 
> there
> an appropriate paper to cite that makes this argument clearly? Thanks 
> much,
>
> -- Andrew
> ----
> Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list 
> info
>