[EM] Re: Arrow's Theorem flawed?
bartman at netgate.net
Thu May 12 21:19:01 PDT 2005
Paul Kislanko wrote:
> I would go a little farther. Since Arrow's was a PROOF in which no one has
> found a flaw in over 50 years, I would say that anyone who has found fault
> with it is not a "vote theorist."
But Arrow didn't prove that IIA compliance was necessary, or even
desirable (although the latter was probably assumed). He merely proved
that IIA was incompatible with other criteria.
More information about the Election-Methods