[EM] Re: Arrow's Theorem flawed?
kislanko at airmail.net
Thu May 12 20:36:44 PDT 2005
> Just a thought, but stating "many vote theorists" without providing
> supporting links to referreed articles might have led to the
> bias decision.
> I'm not saying that your argument is like those supporting Intelligent
> Design or denying Global Warming, but perhaps as a result of the furor
> on those other topics, the wikipedia maintainers are a little
> to unsubstantiated claims.
I would go a little farther. Since Arrow's was a PROOF in which no one has
found a flaw in over 50 years, I would say that anyone who has found fault
with it is not a "vote theorist."
More information about the Election-Methods