[EM] Re: Arrow's Theorem flawed?

Paul Kislanko kislanko at airmail.net
Thu May 12 20:36:44 PDT 2005

Q wrote 
> Just a thought, but stating "many vote theorists" without providing
> supporting links to referreed articles might have led to the 
> bias decision.
> I'm not saying that your argument is like those supporting Intelligent
> Design or denying Global Warming, but perhaps as a result of the furor
> on those other topics, the wikipedia maintainers are a little 
> sensitive
> to unsubstantiated claims.

I would go a little farther. Since Arrow's was a PROOF in which no one has
found a flaw in over 50 years, I would say that anyone who has found fault
with it is not a "vote theorist." 

More information about the Election-Methods mailing list