[EM] Re: wv & Cardinal Pairwise fail Participation and Consistency.

[Araucaria Araucana]

On 26 Apr 2005 at 18:12 UTC-0700, MIKE OSSIPOFF wrote:
> You said:
>
> Could you please show proof that WV (RP/Beatpath/River) passes
> Consistency and CWP does not?

Hi Mike,

I'm getting weary of the sloppy quoting and unthreaded replies.  Whom
are you replying to, and what thread is this supposed to be in?  I
happen to know, since I recognize my own words, but others might have
trouble following.

>
> I reply:

(etc.)

Have you tried reading the election-methods list on the web at this
site?

        http://news.gmane.org/gmane.politics.election-methods

See the box at the top right, labeled "Action".  You can pull down on
that and Followup to the message.  It will then be threaded and quoted
correctly.  You fill in your name and email address in the reply form
and send.

The only minor extra hurdle is that you have to confirm your post from
your email account.  But this is much easier than cutting and pasting.
If you use a tabbed browser like Firefox, you can have your email in
one tab and read the group in another.

If you like, I can also arrange for you (or any other interested
election-methods readers) to get a gmail account (thanks to
Paul/ciphergoth, who invited me about 6 months ago).  Gmail has
excellent spam filtering and 2GB of alloted space.  Just let me know.

Ted
-- 
araucaria dot araucana at gmail dot com