[EM] San Francisco pairwise tallies
Bart Ingles
bartman at netgate.net
Thu Nov 11 20:44:30 PST 2004
I'm surprised the complete ballots were available in a form that would
allow pairwise tallies.
From the Chronicle article I saw, it looked as though _none_ of the
four races requiring a second round ended up with the eventual winner
recieving a majority of votes. Did this turn out to be the case?
If so, I wonder if SF removed the "majority" requirment from their city
charter when IRV was implemented. Could be messy otherwise.
Bart
Justin Sampson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm new to the list. I'm a San Francisco resident and a software engineer,
> and I've recently gotten interesting in election methods. I have performed
> some alternative tallies of our ranked-choice ballots from last week:
>
> http://www.sampsonsynergetics.org/ranked-choice-results.html
>
> I'm a bit mystified by the problems they ran into trying to do the instant
> run-off, since a full pairwise tally only took a few seconds on my old
> laptop. Of course the software and hardware designs are proprietary so we
> can't review them to understand what happened and how they fixed it...
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list