[EM] Condorcet for public proposals - IMV

[Eric Gorr]

At 10:27 PM -0500 1/27/04, Dave Ketchum wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:55:41 -0500 Eric Gorr wrote:
>
>>On Jan 27, 2004, at 5:26 AM, Anthony Duff wrote:
>>
>>>I suggest that a definition of the condorcet election method being
>>>publicly proposed should be explicit about the full pairwise
>>>analysis, and that the possibility of a circular tie, and the
>>>resolution of such a circular tie should be treated like a footnote.
>>
>>
>>Have you read my description of the method found at:
>>
>>   http://www.ericgorr.net/condorcet/rankedpairs/
>>
>>How would you modify it to make it better?
>>
>
>Wording seemed tortured.

What wording?

>Help me understand how the 75 migrated from B/C to A/B.

oops. Thanks for catching that. Example #2 corrected.