[EM] Condorcet for public proposals - IMV

Dave Ketchum davek at clarityconnect.com
Tue Jan 27 19:39:05 PST 2004

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:55:41 -0500 Eric Gorr wrote:

> On Jan 27, 2004, at 5:26 AM, Anthony Duff wrote:
>> I suggest that a definition of the condorcet election method being
>> publicly proposed should be explicit about the full pairwise
>> analysis, and that the possibility of a circular tie, and the
>> resolution of such a circular tie should be treated like a footnote.
> Have you read my description of the method found at:
>   http://www.ericgorr.net/condorcet/rankedpairs/
> How would you modify it to make it better?

Wording seemed tortured.

Help me understand how the 75 migrated from B/C to A/B.
  davek at clarityconnect.com    people.clarityconnect.com/webpages3/davek
  Dave Ketchum   108 Halstead Ave, Owego, NY  13827-1708   607-687-5026
            Do to no one what you would not want done to you.
                  If you want peace, work for justice.

More information about the Election-Methods mailing list