[EM] Condorcet for public proposals - IMV
Dave Ketchum
davek at clarityconnect.com
Tue Jan 27 19:39:05 PST 2004
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:55:41 -0500 Eric Gorr wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2004, at 5:26 AM, Anthony Duff wrote:
>
>> I suggest that a definition of the condorcet election method being
>> publicly proposed should be explicit about the full pairwise
>> analysis, and that the possibility of a circular tie, and the
>> resolution of such a circular tie should be treated like a footnote.
>
>
> Have you read my description of the method found at:
>
> http://www.ericgorr.net/condorcet/rankedpairs/
>
> How would you modify it to make it better?
>
Wording seemed tortured.
Help me understand how the 75 migrated from B/C to A/B.
--
davek at clarityconnect.com people.clarityconnect.com/webpages3/davek
Dave Ketchum 108 Halstead Ave, Owego, NY 13827-1708 607-687-5026
Do to no one what you would not want done to you.
If you want peace, work for justice.
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list