[EM] "Implied ranked choice" method
jgilmour at globalnet.co.uk
Tue Aug 31 15:35:41 PDT 2004
Rob Brown > Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 9:50 PM
> One of the biggest problems with ranked choice voting
> (whether it be tabulated
> by a condorcet method or IRV or whatever) is that ballots can
> be rather
> complex and it would presumably be expensive to implement as
> well as to > educate people on how to vote.
"PR is as easy as 1, 2, 3 ...". Official education slogan when STV-PR was re-introduced in
Northern Ireland in 1973. It says it all. STV-PR has been implemented successfully with paper
ballots for many years. Electronic voting machines were used successfully for STV-PR in the
Republic of Ireland in 2002 (only problem was the machines used had no paper audit).
> Another problem is > that voters would
> need to be familiar with a larger selection of candidates
> than they do today,
Yeah - democracy don't work too well if the voters are ignorant, but in a democracy that's the
> since there would be less need to filter them out via primaries.
I'm not a fan of US-style primaries, but there would be no need to drop them for either
single-winner elections or multi-seat elections. All parties will want some method of finding their
"best" candidate or candidates.
> Instead of the voters having to rank candidates, they just
> vote like they do
> today, for a single candidate. But each candidate would
> provide the list of second choice candidates.
If you really believe in democracy as representation of the people I don't see how you can support
any form of so called "proxy voting" in which you hand over this critical decision of choosing YOUR
representative(s) to a candidate or a party. The support for proxy voting on this list quite
literally amazes me.
More information about the Election-Methods