[EM] river, ROACC (terminolgy, again)
seppley at alumni.caltech.edu
Sat Aug 28 14:11:10 PDT 2004
Warren S wrote:
> To avoid this ambiguity, I suggest we use a different
> term for describing algorithms that use chance,
> such as "randomized".
Aren't all the voting methods we've been promoting
both anonymous and neutral? Doesn't that mean
none of them are entirely non-random?
50%: A > B
50%: B > A
It'd be nice if our terminology distinguished between
voting methods that will rarely involve chance and
those that will often involve chance.
More information about the Election-Methods