[EM] Condorcet in 12 words or less
Eric Gorr
eric at ericgorr.net
Wed Aug 18 12:18:39 PDT 2004
ooo...I like it.
Got rid of the extra word in Approval Voting as well...
Vote for one or more candidates. Candidate with the most votes wins.
At 12:06 PM -0700 8/18/04, mrouse1 at mrouse.com wrote:
>One should simplify as much as possible but no further. Still, here goes:
>
>Rank candidates and elect pairwise winner.
>
>Six words. :)
>
>Mike Rouse
>mrouse at mrouse.com
>
>Eric Gorr wrote:
>
>>Anyone want to take a stab an giving an explanation of Condorcet
>>Voting in 12 words or less...?
>>
>>Had a conversation recently with an IRV supporter who is supporting
>>IRV over Condorcet and Approval Voting because IRV can be explained
>>in 12 words or less (but has yet to provide that explanation) and
>>he apparently believes that Approval Voting and Condorcet Voting
>>cannot be. (yes, I'm serious)
>>
>>I took a stab at Approval Voting:
>>
>> Vote for one or more candidates. Elect the candidate with the most votes.
>>
>>but got 13 words...apparently not good enough.
>>
>>
>>----
>>Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
>>
>
>----
>Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
--
== Eric Gorr ========= http://www.ericgorr.net ========= ICQ:9293199 ===
"Therefore the considerations of the intelligent always include both
benefit and harm." - Sun Tzu
== Insults, like violence, are the last refuge of the incompetent... ===
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list