[EM] Securing electronic elections

Stephane Rouillon stephane.rouillon at sympatico.ca
Tue Nov 11 17:22:05 PST 2003

I think like Anthony.
Let's use electronic speed and validation advantages,
paper copy safety and an election board
that knows statistics well enough to spot fraud and do random validations...


Anthony Duff a écrit :

>  --- matt at tidalwave.net wrote:
> > A non-encrypted voting receipt that identifies the votes cast by a voter creates
> > potential for mischief, particularly if it is retained by the individual voter.
> > Thugs could demand to see the receipt and intimidate voters, imposing physical,
> > economic or social harm on those who voted "incorrectly".  Also, counterfeit receipts
> > could be utilized to falsely challange election outcomes.
> My favourite solution is this:
> When the voter has completed voting using a computer, a hard copy is produced.  The
> voter checks the correctness of the hard copy and puts it into a traditional ballot box
> on the way out of the polling station.
> Results are calculated by computer.  Challenges to the electronic recording and
> counting of votes are resolved by counting the paper hard copies.
> The people and organisations that have access to the computers, the software and data
> are kept entirely distinct from those who have control and access to the ballots.
> http://personals.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Personals
> New people, new possibilities. FREE for a limited time.
> ----
> Election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

More information about the Election-Methods mailing list