[EM] 'Strategies'
Kevin Venzke
stepjak at yahoo.fr
Thu May 1 18:51:15 PDT 2003
Forest,
I didn't understand this. Allow me to ask questions:
--- Forest Simmons <fsimmons at pcc.edu> a écrit : >
> What if we changed this last step as follows?
>
> Elect THE CANDIDATE that is above the average rating (or ranking, if
> ratings are not available) of the "finalists" on the greatest number of
> ballots.
Is "the candidate" one of the pair members? If so, are you saying the
winner should be picked from the tie based on a Borda-type score?
> In other words, consider the "PAIR" with greatest approval in the first
> part as a pair of provisional finalists, and then in part two treat them
> like equally ranked frontrunners in an approval election.
I don't understand the circumstances resulting in the replacement of
a provisional finalist. Also, what do you mean by "treat them like
equally ranked frontrunners in an approval election"?
Thanks
Kevin Venzke
stepjak at yahoo.fr
___________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list