[EM] Condorcet Flavored PR Methods
Adam Tarr
atarr at purdue.edu
Thu Nov 7 09:40:08 PST 2002
2 more questions about Condorcet-PR:
- is there any sequential version of this? I can't figure one, since the
placement of the cutoffs depends on the total number of candidates being
elected.
- I will admit this is the first election method I've dealt with where I
have trouble manipulating small examples. Here's a very small example that
was gibing me trouble: say we are electing two candidates out of four. My
ballot is: A(>B=C=D). The pairwise matrix will be 6x6 (with 6 empty
slots). With respect to my ballot, every comparison is equivalent to one
of the following:
AB vs. CD
(k1 + j2 = 1 + 1 = 2? k2 + j1 = 0 + .5 = .5?)
or
AB vs. BD
(k1 + j2 = .5 + 1 = 1.5? k2 + j1 = 0 + 1 = 1?)
or
AB vs. AC
(k1 + j2 = k2 + j1 = 1.5 + .5 = 2)
Do the summations I wrote make sense? The results (except the trivial last
one) seem a bit odd. I was toying with this example to try and measure how
equivalent your Condorcet-PR method is to PAV in situations where the
voters vote in an approval-like fashion.
----
For more information about this list (subscribe, unsubscribe, FAQ, etc),
please see http://www.eskimo.com/~robla/em
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list