[EM] Junk Irving Method
DEMOREP1 at aol.com
DEMOREP1 at aol.com
Tue May 7 11:57:58 PDT 2002
The great pseudo math expert Donald wrote in part-
That is one of the bad features of Condorcet, it does not always measure up
to the `standard' of Irving.
----
D- Of course the so-called *standard of Irving* is one of the many pieces of
absolute junk in election methods -- like plurality.
Donald just loves getting Irving false majorities.
How many HItler clones and Stalin clones will Irving elect ???
34 HWS
33 SWH
32 W
99
W is the Condorcet Winner.
W may get 99 votes in a YES / NO vote.
With the now infamous Irving, the Hitler clone wins.
Just swell --- if you are a lover of Nazi death and destruction -- possibly
alternating with a Stalin clone and Communist death and destruction..
Some political morons (who have just *enough* simple math knowlege to be
morons in higher math subjects) can never progress beyond their simple
knowledge --- like folks in the old days claiming that the planets and the
Sun went around the Earth --- it looks like that every day.
Reality --- the earth is spinning giving the above illusion with the planets
in elliptical orbits around the sun.
Sorry Donald -- the *advanced math* of Condorcet exists --- just like the
various conic formulas exist --- beyond simple circles.
----
For more information about this list (subscribe, unsubscribe, FAQ, etc),
please see http://www.eskimo.com/~robla/em
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list