[EM] I pledge $50 to Hager

[MIKE OSSIPOFF]

As my subject line said, I PLEDGE FIFTY
DOLLARS TO HAGER

AGAIN THIS COMPUTER IS WRITING
CAPITAL LETTERS AND THE CAP LOCK
DOESN"T HELP

IF IT'S BEST TO CONCENTRATE DONATIONS TO ONE CANDIDATE , IF THERE ARE MORE,
THEN I CLAIM THAT THERE'S NO  NEED
TO  WAIT TILL HAGER IS NOMINATED.
IT'S IMPORTANT THAT HE BE NOMINATED,
SO WE SHOULD HELP HIM NOW.

IT'S ADIFFICULT QUESTION, WHETHER TO
CONCETNTRATE OR DIVIDE CONTRIBUTIONS. BUT WE'LL GET A BETTER
PERSPECTIVE ON THAT WHEN WE GET
MORE NOMINATIONS.  I RENOMINATE
HAGER. AS BART SAID, HAGER MAY BE
THE ONLY APPROVAL ADVOCATING
CANDIDATE.

REGRETABLY THE SMALL PARTIES HAVE
BEEN LARGELY WON OVER BY CVD,
THE GREENS ARE FOR IRV, AND LOCAL
OR STATE LIBERTARIANS ENDORSED SF'S
IRV INITIATIVE. BUT I BELIEVE THERE'S A
STATE LIBERTARIAN ORGANIZATION THAT
USES APPROVAL FOR ITS ELECTIONS.
OR MAYBE JUST A LOCAL ONE.

I LIKE  THE  IDEA OF DIFFERENT BRIEF
MESSAGES TO SMALL PARTIES, COUNTIES,  ETC, TALKING ABOUT ISSUES IMPORTANT
TO THEM.

OF COURSE WE AREN'T HELPING HAGER
TO GAIN INFLUENCE, THOUGH THE DONATIONS  COULD OF COURSE SHOW
THAT APPROVAL WORK ISN'T ENTIRELY
THANKLESS. IF WE HELP GET HIM NOMINATED, IF WE GET HIM MORE MEDIA
SPACE, WE ADVANCE APPROVAL.

MIKE OSSIPOFF



_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com