FW: [EM] Ballot for poll on poll topics

[LAYTON Craig]

Sorry.  I was supposed to send this to the list, right?

In passing - I've deleted the message, but I noticed that Donald dismissed
discussion of multi-winner methods with some claim that "everyone" used
single winner elections.  I mean, really.  Even the US uses multi-winner
elections for many councils & school board elections etc, and is in the
minority as a country that doesn't use some kind of multi-winner system to
elect one of the houses of its national parliament.  Thinking that single
winner elections are the "norm" is just Anglo-American bias.

-----Original Message-----
From: LAYTON Craig 
Sent: Wednesday, 21 March 2001 10:44
To: 'nkklrp at hotmail.com'
Subject: RE: [EM] Ballot for poll on poll topics

>What method do you designate for determining your Approval votes, for
>the Voter's Choice count?

Cloneproof SSD

>[I hope these columns post ok. I've left 2 spaces in some of the brackets, 
>in case your computer isn't set for "insert"]
>
>The first column is for the rank number that you assign. The 2nd
>column is for your Approval vote. The 3rd column is for your rating
>(which may be sincere or strategic):


r     a    r
a     p    a
n     p    t
k     r    e
[   ] [ ] [  ]Months
[   ] [ ] [  ] List Conduct Petition
[ 4 ] [x] [ 5]Voting Systems
[ 6 ] [ ] [  ]Pizza Toppings
[ 5 ] [ ] [  ]Ice Cream Flavors
[ 3 ] [x] [ 6]TV shows
[ 3 ] [x] [ 6]Movies
[ 2 ] [x] [ 8]Presidential Candidates of 2000.
[ 1 ] [x] [10]Multiwinner systems
[ 8 ] [ ] [  ]Restaurant menu selections
[ 8 ] [ ] [  ]Minimum voting age
[ 7 ] [ ] [  ]Historical figures to bring via time-machine
[ 8 ] [ ] [  ]Nonpresidential Nicknames