Ooops! Re: STV without Elimination (fwd)

[David Catchpole]

Woops! That should be "nonmonotonicity" rather than "monotonicity"!

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1998 15:41:33 +1000 (GMT+1000)
From: David Catchpole <s349436 at student.uq.edu.au>
To: election-methods-list at eskimo.com
Subject: Re: STV without Elimination
Resent-Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1998 22:40:43 -0700
Resent-From: election-methods-list at eskimo.com

>Tideman's system basically weights STV outcomes. I've read his articles,
>and when I think of it, his system, while it may possibly avoid
>monotonicity, does diverge significantly from what I suggested. By the