Ooops! Re: STV without Elimination (fwd)

David Catchpole s349436 at
Wed Sep 2 23:03:44 PDT 1998

Woops! That should be "nonmonotonicity" rather than "monotonicity"!

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1998 15:41:33 +1000 (GMT+1000)
From: David Catchpole <s349436 at>
To: election-methods-list at
Subject: Re: STV without Elimination
Resent-Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1998 22:40:43 -0700
Resent-From: election-methods-list at

>Tideman's system basically weights STV outcomes. I've read his articles,
>and when I think of it, his system, while it may possibly avoid
>monotonicity, does diverge significantly from what I suggested. By the

More information about the Election-Methods mailing list