First Choice Criterion

[Beth Cornell]

Sorry I am not really informed about this subject. Could you please send me more information. Beth Cornell 
--

On Wed, 04 Nov 1998 11:36:05   Blake Cretney wrote:
>This is a follow up to a discussion with Mike about his new
>First Choice Criterion (strong form).  
>I address the remainder to Mike.
>
>So far, I think it means something like this,
>
>It should never be necessary to vote a less-liked alternative equal
>to or over one's favorite in order to ensure the sincere CW wins.
>
>But what's missing is the "necessary for WHO" part.  That is, who
>has to be co-operating to ensure the CW win.  For example, "all
>voters" or "any majority of voters".
>
>Also, could you provide an example of ballots where VA Condorcet
>passes, but Marginal Condorcet fails this criterion.
>
>---
>
>Blake
>
>
>
>-----== Sent via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==-----
>http://www.dejanews.com/  Easy access to 50,000+ discussion forums
>
>


-----== Sent via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/  Easy access to 50,000+ discussion forums