Tie breakers

[Steve Eppley]

DEMOREP1 at aol.com wrote:
[snip]
>Any tie breaker should be made usable for both single winner
>executive or judicial elections and multi-winner executive or
>judicial elections (e.g. 2 or more sheriffs or judges in a given
>area). 

It looks like you're saying that one of your standards for
tie-breakers is that they need to be universal--good for both
singlewinner and multiwinner elections.  Have I interpreted you
right?  If so, why do you believe this?  You offered no explanation. 

--Steve