Subcycles and the Rich Party Problem

[Steve Eppley]

Mike O wrote:
-snip-
>Adding the subcycle rule to Copeland would be a patch that would
>necessitate a generalization of ITC in order to still be able to
>demark methods that have the Rich Parties problem from methods that
>don't have it. 
-snip-

What generalization of ITC do you have in mind that subcycle-patched 
Copeland would fail?

---Steve     (Steve Eppley    seppley at alumni.caltech.edu)