[EM] David Gamble reply, 1/23/03 1012 GMT

[Dgamble997 at aol.com]

Marcus,

I wasn't thinking of your paper when I made that post as is hopefully evident 
from my reply to Mike. I (subjectively) find your paper objective. I also 
notice that you mention a criterion (participation) that Schulze, Swartz 
Sequential Dropping, Beatpath, call it what you will, fails and give a demonstration 
of how it can fail it.

David Gamble

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20040124/2b278330/attachment-0003.htm>