[EM] Better Smith Majority Approval
nkklrp at hotmail.com
Thu Jan 15 00:50:01 PST 2004
(deletes for majority defeats only if they're not in a cycle of majority
Balloting: Rank-Balloting, with Approval cutoff.
Truncation & equal-ranking allowed.
1. Drop from the rankings every candidate who isn't in the Smith set.
2. If more than 1 remains, drop from the rankings every candidate who has a
majority defeat that isn't in a cycle of majority defeats, unless that would
delete all the remaining candidates.
3. If more than 1 remain, apply Approval, electing the candidate above the
most voters' Approval cutoffs.
[end of Smith Majority Approval definition]
This is for public elections. For committees, meetings, organizations and
polls whose participants don't object to the added wordiness of the Schwartz
set, the use of the Schwartz set instead of the Smith set would be a good
As with any good method, the tie-drop-option could be useful if there were
concern about offensive order-reversal. It gives the voter the option to
mark a tie-drop-line to indicate that if there's a circular tie whose every
member has a majority defeat in that cycle, and with some members above that
tie-drop-line and some below it, then that voter wants to delete from his
ranking all the candidates below his tie-drop-line.
Likewise the other anti-order-reversal enhancements that I've described
could be useful if there were concern about offensive order-reversal.
Smith Majority Approal, like NES, is intended to meet the standards &
criteria that I consider important, with defensive strategy properties like
those of wv, while minimizing other strategy incentives.
Let the new MSN Premium Internet Software make the most of your high-speed
More information about the Election-Methods