[EM] Consensus?: IRV vs. Primary w/Runoff
    Markus Schulze 
    markus.schulze at alumni.tu-berlin.de
       
    Tue Feb  5 02:36:02 PST 2002
    
    
  
Dear Forest,
you wrote (4 Feb 2002):
> Markus wrote (4 Feb 2002):
> > In so far as IRV meets majority for solid coalitions and independence
> > from clones, IRV can hardly be called "erratic" compared to primary
> > with runoff.
>
> Evidently the "erratic" that I have described is different from the
> "erratic" that is measured in terms of solid coalitions and independence
> from clones. The "erratic" that I described has more to do with the
> complexity of strategy and the sensitivity or strategy to variations
> in information.
Of course, then you have to explain why it is bad for an election method
to be "erratic".
Markus Schulze
    
    
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list