[EM] software

[Elisabeth Varin/Stephane Rouillon]

It seems we will have to rely on you...
I proposed to use an objective function that increase of 1 value
each time the winner goes up one step on the ladder of sincere
preferences of the insincere truncator. Naturally, the objective
should decrease of one point for each step lower the winner
is ranked on the same scale...

Steph.

"Narins, Josh" a écrit :

> I like computer software.
>
> Does anyone have anything that, say, makes every collection of 100 ranked
> ballots of three candidates, throw them against 20 election methods, and
> see, for instance...
>
> What % of the time the Condorcet winner is the winner, if one exists?
> How few vote changes would change the result? (possibly interesting?)
> and the like?
>
> Thx.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above.  If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.  This communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman Brothers.  Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free.  Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such.  All information is subject to change without notice.
>
> ----
> For more information about this list (subscribe, unsubscribe, FAQ, etc),
> please see http://www.eskimo.com/~robla/em

----
For more information about this list (subscribe, unsubscribe, FAQ, etc), 
please see http://www.eskimo.com/~robla/em