<html><head></head><body><div class="ydp5836c3d1yahoo-style-wrap" style="font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;"><div></div>
<div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">My understanding was that Maximal Lotteries (a non-deterministic Condorcet method) did pass participation. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximal_lotteries" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" class="">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximal_lotteries</a></div><div><br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">Toby</div><div><br></div><div><span style="color: rgb(38, 40, 42);">On Saturday, 4 April 2026 at 01:16:10 BST, Kevin Venzke via Election-Methods <election-methods@lists.electorama.com> wrote:</span></div></div><div id="ydp9e635504yahoo_quoted_6215213008" class="ydp9e635504yahoo_quoted"><div style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:#26282a;">
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">Definitely not. Very few methods satisfy Participation, certainly not ones that<br></div><div dir="ltr">resemble Condorcet. The most complicated Participation methods are DAC and DSC.<br></div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">Kevin<br></div><div dir="ltr">votingmethods.net<br></div><div dir="ltr">----<br></div><div dir="ltr">Election-Methods mailing list - see <a href="https://electorama.com/em" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://electorama.com/em</a> for list info<br></div></div>
</div>
</div></body></html>