<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>An interesting video on a channel I recently came across:<br>
      <br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFD5npXRYi8">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFD5npXRYi8</a><br>
      <br>
      <blockquote type="cite">Here's Why Australian Elections Can't Be
        Rigged | AUSPOL EXPLAINED<br>
        Auspol Explained<br>
        28.3K subscribers<br>
        <br>
        63,337 views  May 12, 2025  #40 on Trending<br>
        Every election there'll be someone unhappy with the results and
        someone claiming it was rigged. But in Australia that kind of
        claim just doesn't stack up. There is a LOT of scrutiny on
        Australian elections! They're also run by independent electoral
        commissions. So, if you doubt their validity or if you're just
        curious about all the levels of details, security, scrutiny and
        transparency that goes into ensuring that elections are fair and
        conducted impartially then here's an episode explaining just how
        hard it is to do anything dodgy. This may also help you provide
        rebuttals to anyone claiming in your life "it was rigged!"
        simply because they don't like a result.<br>
        <br>
        Learn more about elections and voting in Australia at:
        <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://aec.gov.au/">https://aec.gov.au/</a> <br>
        <br>
        You can get a copy of the script with citations here:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wKgiSj9llxqeID746WS532mhOZR65gp1/view?pli=1">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wKgiSj9llxqeID746WS532mhOZR65gp1/view?pli=1</a></blockquote>
      <br>
      I watched all of it and thought it was fine.<br>
      <br>
      Not discussed in this video but it also helps a lot that the Hare
      method used is Clone Independent. <br>
      <br>
      Chris Benham<br>
      <br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/05/2025 2:22 am, Chris Benham via
      Election-Methods wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:c35e18d1-5a8c-476f-87b5-f75b9c02a930@yahoo.com.au">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <p>In practice in Australia there is nothing stopping anyone from
        voting "informally" by say just submitting a blank ballot.<br>
        <br>
        I consider such "compulsory voting" to be a small evil which
        guards against much greater potential evil.  If the state is
        compelling you to vote then it must of course make sure that you
        have an opportunity to vote.<br>
        <br>
        Regarding "levels of ranking" there is never any "space" issue
        in Australia.  The paper ballots are just made as big as they
        need to be for every candidate listed with a box next to their
        name.<br>
        <br>
        If voters are restricted in the number of candidates they can
        strictly rank then some of Hare's good properties, such as
        compliance with Clone Independence and  Mutual Majority are
        stuffed up.  And allowing equal-ranking in Hare makes it,
        depending on how the equal rankings are handled,  more awkward
        and/or  somewhat more vulnerable to Push-over strategy.  I have
        never heard anyone in Australia complain about not being able to
        equal-rank above bottom.  <br>
        <br>
        If we must have limited ranking levels and allow equal ranking,
        then some Condorcet methods suffer far less.  My favourite is
        still  Margins Sorted Approval (explicit).<br>
        <br>
        Chris<br>
        <br>
      </p>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/05/2025 5:41 am, robert
        bristow-johnson via Election-Methods wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite"
        cite="mid:l5qsdp7pc2viinssl5gudohm.1746302557418@email.lge.com">
        <meta http-equiv="content-type"
          content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
        <div style="font-size: 10pt;">
          <div dir="auto">I've never understood, in a free society, the
            compulsory voting requirement.  I also don't understand that
            for our city councilors, unless they recuse themselves.</div>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">One *should* be allowed to be neutral or even
            ignorant of the alternatives in a choice and abstain to
            vote.  It's our right to not take a position on an issue
            just as much as it's our right to take any position on the
            same issue.</div>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">Voters should be allowed to rank as many (as
            space permits, there might be a limit of 5 or 6 levels of
            ranking) or as few candidates as they want.  And voters
            should be able to equally rank as many candidates as they
            want.  Of course, all unranked candidates are tied for last
            place on that voter's ballot.</div>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">And our votes must count equally.  Hence
            Condorcet for single-winner RCV elections .</div>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div>
            <div dir="auto" font-size:9pt;"=""><i>Powered by Cricket
                Wireless</i></div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div style="font-size: 10pt;">
          <div id="LGEmailHeader" dir="auto">
            <div dir="auto"><br>
            </div>
            <div dir="auto">------ Original message------</div>
            <div dir="auto"><b>From: </b>Chris Benham via
              Election-Methods<election-methods@lists.electorama.com></election-methods@lists.electorama.com></div>
            <div dir="auto"><b>Date: </b>Sat, May 3, 2025 10:25</div>
            <div dir="auto"><b>To: </b>Etjon Basha;</div>
            <div dir="auto"><b>Cc: </b>EM;Kevin Venzke;Forest Simmons;</div>
            <div dir="auto"><b>Subject:</b>Re: [EM] Election day in
              Australia</div>
            <div dir="auto"><br>
            </div>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">
            <p>Etjon,<br>
              <br>
              There is no concept of "approval" in STV.  But from my
              point of view, no problem allowing voters to rank or
              truncate as much as they like (especially in the
              single-winner case).<br>
              <br>
              But I think the official thinking is that compulsory
              preferences are in the "spirit" of compulsory voting. 
              Since everyone has to obey the laws passed by the
              legislators and the government will (very likely)be formed
              by one or another major party, then the government is more
              legitimate if everyone is coerced/cajoled into expressing
              a preference for one of the major parties over another. 
              If people could show up and just bullet-vote for "nobody",
              what is the point of them voting?  And if there is no
              point in them voting then how can we justify forcing them
              to vote?  (Still possible in my opinion but maybe more
              difficult.)<br>
              <br>
              What I consulted to help decide how I would vote:<br>
              <br>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                href="https://www.buildaballot.org.au/electorates/sturt"
                moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.buildaballot.org.au/electorates/sturt</a><br>
              <br>
              <br>
            </p>
            <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/05/2025 11:09 pm, Etjon
              Basha wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CA+EJN6TnBGu1xDU8_wPkR-bv6VjKoYSTV8oDY7YMLOUvkhdtZQ@mail.gmail.com">
              <div dir="auto">A bit of a bother, especially the 12 on
                the Senate side. Showing my ignorance here, but what
                issue would there be in allowing voters (who, in this
                particular case, have to show up on pains of a fine) to
                rank as many of as few as they like, and show approval
                by proxy that way? Exhausted votes? So what?</div>
              <br>
              <div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container">
                <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, 3 May 2025,
                  11:33 pm Chris Benham via Election-Methods, <<a
                    href="mailto:election-methods@lists.electorama.com"
                     ="" moz-do-not-send="true"
                    class="moz-txt-link-freetext"><a
href="mailto:election-methods@lists.electorama.com"
                      moz-do-not-send="true"
                      class="moz-txt-link-freetext">election-methods@lists.electorama.com</a>>
                    wrote:<br>
                  </a ></div>
                <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                  <div>
                    <p><br>
                      The "Leader of the Opposition"  (the leader of the
                      parliamentary Liberal Party, Peter Dutton ) has
                      conceded defeat.  So the Labor federal government
                      stays in power and the current Prime Minister
                      keeps his job.<br>
                      <br>
                      I was compelled to vote today, and if I wanted to
                      have my vote counted (and possibly affect the
                      result) I had to strictly rank all seven
                      candidates for the single-member district  I live
                      in (in the state of South Australia) for a seat in
                      the House of Representatives.<br>
                      <br>
                      I dislike compulsory preferences, but I don't
                      notice anyone else complaining about them. I
                      consider them are far lesser evil than any
                      limitation on the number of candidates a voter can
                      rank, as happens in some parts of the world that
                      use some version of Hare/IRV.<br>
                    </p>
                    <p>The GIGO  (garbage in, garbage out) effect of
                      compulsory full-ranking is much lower with Hare
                      than it would be with a Condorcet method or
                      Borda.  And the days when most of the voters had
                      an FPP mindset and the way you vote for party X is
                      to blindly follow X's "how-to-vote card" handed to
                      you by a volunteer as you enter the polling
                      station are  mostly over (or at least have receded
                      a lot). So is there is less of the effect of
                      transferring some power from voters to small
                      parties whose candidates get eliminated.<br>
                      <br>
                      As well I voted among 39 candidates to fill six
                      vacancies for the Senate, using STV-PR
                      (semi-corrupted into a sort of fixed List PR). 
                      The candidates were in 16 party groups plus one
                      "Ungrouped" group.  Each group had a least two
                      candidates and at most four (but I assume five and
                      six are allowed).   I could either ignore the
                      groups and number at least 12 candidates, or I
                      could ignore the individual candidates and vote 
                      "above the line" and number at least 6 groups.<br>
                      <br>
                      Australia has a "Westminster" style parliamentary
                      system and the house of parliament on which the
                      government is based is elected using single-member
                      districts.  The election campaigns tend to be
                      quasi-presidential with a lot of focus on which
                      leader of one of the two major parties voters want
                      to be Prime Minister and much less on individual
                      local candidates.<br>
                      <br>
                      One way I think this can be undemocratic is if the
                      leader of the winning party fails to keep his
                      seat. Peter Dutton I gather is not completely safe
                      in his seat. It could have happened that a
                      majority of voters voted Liberal because they
                      wanted Peter Dutton to be Prime Minister but were
                      denied just because the voters in his district
                      rejected him. So then the PM would be a Liberal MP
                      elected by the Liberal MPs to be the new leader of
                      the parliamentary Liberal party, someone the
                      majority of voters may dislike or know little or
                      nothing about.<br>
                      <br>
                      The leader of a major party is obviously far less
                      likely to lose his seat in a multi-member district
                      using PR.  And that problem can't exist in a
                      system where the head of the government is
                      directly elected.<br>
                      <br>
                      <a href="https: www.abc.net.au="" news=""
                        elections="" federal-election-2025" =""
                        target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"
                        moz-do-not-send="true"  =""
                        class="moz-txt-link-freetext"><a
href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/elections/federal-election-2025"
                          moz-do-not-send="true"
                          class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://www.abc.net.au/news/elections/federal-election-2025</a><br>
                        <br>
                        <a href="https: www.abc.net.au="" news=""
                          2025-05-03=""
peter-dutton-losing-dickson-coalition-leadership="" 105247916" =""
                          target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"
                          moz-do-not-send="true"  =""
                          class="moz-txt-link-freetext"><a
href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-03/peter-dutton-losing-dickson-coalition-leadership/105247916"
                            moz-do-not-send="true"
                            class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-03/peter-dutton-losing-dickson-coalition-leadership/105247916</a><br>
                        </a href="https:></a href="https:></p>
                    <blockquote type="cite"> <h2 style="font-size:1.25rem;line-height:1.5;margin-bottom:0.5rem;font-weight:700;color:rgb(16,49,106);font-family:abcsans,-apple-system,blinkmacsystemfont,"segoe
                        ui",roboto,"helvetica=""
neue",arial,sans-serif;box-sizing:border-box;margin-top:0px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;word-spacing:0px;white-space:normal;background-color:rgb(236,242,251);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial"="">In
                        short: <p style="box-sizing:border-box;margin:0.5rem
0px;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:abcsans,-apple-system,blinkmacsystemfont,"segoe=""
                          ui",roboto,"helvetica=""
neue",arial,sans-serif;font-size:18px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;word-spacing:0px;white-space:normal;background-color:rgb(236,242,251);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial"="">Peter
                          Dutton will become the first federal leader of
                          an opposition to lose his own seat. <p style="box-sizing:border-box;margin:0.5rem
0px;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:abcsans,-apple-system,blinkmacsystemfont,"segoe=""
                            ui",roboto,"helvetica=""
neue",arial,sans-serif;font-size:18px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;word-spacing:0px;white-space:normal;background-color:rgb(236,242,251);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial"="">Mr
                            Dutton has conceded he has lost Dickson. <h2 style="font-size:1.25rem;line-height:1.5;margin-bottom:0.5rem;font-weight:700;color:rgb(16,49,106);font-family:abcsans,-apple-system,blinkmacsystemfont,"segoe
                              ui",roboto,"helvetica=""
neue",arial,sans-serif;box-sizing:border-box;margin-top:1.5rem;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;word-spacing:0px;white-space:normal;background-color:rgb(236,242,251);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial"="">What's
                              next? <p style="box-sizing:border-box;margin:0.5rem
                                0px=""
0px;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:abcsans,-apple-system,blinkmacsystemfont,"segoe=""
                                ui",roboto,"helvetica=""
neue",arial,sans-serif;font-size:18px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;word-spacing:0px;white-space:normal;background-color:rgb(236,242,251);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial"="">The
                                Liberal Party will have to search for a
                                new leader. </p style="box-sizing:border-box;margin:0.5rem></h2 style="font-size:1.25rem;line-height:1.5;margin-bottom:0.5rem;font-weight:700;color:rgb(16,49,106);font-family:abcsans,-apple-system,blinkmacsystemfont,"segoe></p style="box-sizing:border-box;margin:0.5rem></p style="box-sizing:border-box;margin:0.5rem></h2 style="font-size:1.25rem;line-height:1.5;margin-bottom:0.5rem;font-weight:700;color:rgb(16,49,106);font-family:abcsans,-apple-system,blinkmacsystemfont,"segoe></blockquote>
                    <br>
                    <a href="https: www.abc.net.au="" news=""
                      2025-05-03=""
act-election-results-senate-house-of-representatives-2025=""
                      105244060" ="" target="_blank"
                      rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true"  =""
                      class="moz-txt-link-freetext"><a
href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-03/act-election-results-senate-house-of-representatives-2025/105244060"
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-03/act-election-results-senate-house-of-representatives-2025/105244060</a><br>
                      <br>
                      <blockquote type="cite"><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:abcsans,-apple-system,blinkmacsystemfont,"segoe
                          ui",roboto,"helvetica=""
neue",arial,sans-serif;font-size:18px;font-style:normal;font-variant-ligatures:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:400;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;word-spacing:0px;white-space:normal;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);text-decoration-style:initial;text-decoration-color:initial;display:inline!important;float:none"="">"I
                          think we've seen across the country
                          independents doing well … some who haven't
                          quite won a seat but have made a seat marginal
                          for the first time, and I think that's more
                          and more people wanting a different kind of
                          politics in Australia," Mr Pocock said.</span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:abcsans,-apple-system,blinkmacsystemfont,"segoe></blockquote>
                      <br>
                      Chris B.<br>
                      <div><br>
                        On 3/05/2025 11:38 am, Rob Lanphier via
                        Election-Methods wrote:<br>
                      </div>
                      <blockquote type="cite">
                        <pre>Hi folks,

Australia is holding an election now.  Rumor has it (or should I say
"rumour has it") that these are the best places to track the
Australian election results:
* <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/elections/federal-election-2025"
                         ="" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://www.abc.net.au/news/elections/federal-election-2025</a>
* <a href="https://results.aec.gov.au/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"
                         ="" moz-do-not-send="true"
                        class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://results.aec.gov.au/</a>
* <a href="https: en.wikipedia.org="" wiki=""
                        2025_australian_federal_election" =""
                        target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"
                        moz-do-not-send="true"  =""
                        class="moz-txt-link-freetext"><a
href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Australian_federal_election"
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Australian_federal_election</a>

Anyone got other reliable sites to track in real-time?  If (by the
time you read this), the important elections have all been decided,
I'm curious to know if you have an opinion on the results (especially
an informed opinion).  The math on this one should be interesting...

Rob
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see <a href="https://electorama.com/em"
                         ="" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://electorama.com/em</a> for list info
</a href="https:></pre>
                      </blockquote>
                    </a href="https:></div>
                  ----<br>
                  Election-Methods mailing list - see <a
                    href="https://electorama.com/em"
                    rel="noreferrer noreferrer"  ="" target="_blank"
                    moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"><a
                      href="https://electorama.com/em"
                      moz-do-not-send="true"
                      class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://electorama.com/em</a>
                    for list info<br>
                  </a ></blockquote>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
        </div>
        <br>
        <fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
        <pre wrap="" class="moz-quote-pre">----
Election-Methods mailing list - see <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
        href="https://electorama.com/em" moz-do-not-send="true">https://electorama.com/em</a> for list info
</pre>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
      <pre wrap="" class="moz-quote-pre">----
Election-Methods mailing list - see <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://electorama.com/em">https://electorama.com/em</a> for list info
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>