<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span lang="EN-US">Lately, I've been updating my Electowiki page,<br><a href="https://electowiki.org/wiki/User:Kristomun/Proposed_voting_methods" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://electowiki.org/wiki/User:Kristomun/Proposed_voting_methods</a>. This<br>page lists various voting methods that aren't described in detail on the<br>wiki, but have been proposed in either literature or on EM.<br><br>Though I've managed to find a number of methods (including one that<br>might provide a divisor PR analog of the DPC), I imagine there are still<br>lots out there that I haven't happened across. So I'd like to ask the<br>list: do you know any methods that have been proposed or discussed but</span></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">that neither have their own Electowiki articles nor are listed on my page?</blockquote><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><br></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><br></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Hi Kristofer
and all,<span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">I can forward
a few, though only the first two have been provided here by me a couple weeks
back (one of the Warren derivatives as well was mentioned a couple years back IIRC):<span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">1. Ranked
ballots where truncation and equal ranking are allowed:<span></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><br></span></p>
</div></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 40px;border:none;padding:0px"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">1.1 Linked to
or electing from the Serious Candidate Set:</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><br></span></p></div></div></blockquote><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 40px;border:none;padding:0px"><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 40px;border:none;padding:0px"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">1.1.1 Consider
only those candidates who would win an approval count if they were to serve as
the universal approval cutoff across all ballots. If there are several, elect
the candidate who wins their count by the greatest margin compared to the
runner-up. </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><br></span></p></div></div></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 40px;border:none;padding:0px"><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 40px;border:none;padding:0px"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">1.2.1 Truncate
all ballots at the candidate(s) who has the greatest number of first
preferences. Elect the approval winner from this truncated set of ballots. </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><br></span></p></div></div></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 40px;border:none;padding:0px"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">1.2 Derivative
of Warren STV, not discussed here before by me, not sure if already existing
or if worth considering re criteria:</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><br></span></p></div></div></blockquote><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 40px;border:none;padding:0px"><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 40px;border:none;padding:0px"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">1.2.1 Run a
Warren STV count such as to leave all running candidates with the exact same number
of votes and elect the candidate with the lowest keep value (similar to approval,
but not quite the same as is more aware of rank). </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><br></span></p></div></div></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 40px;border:none;padding:0px"><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 40px;border:none;padding:0px"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">1.2.2 Run a
Warren STV count such as to leave all running candidates with the exact same number
of votes, eliminate the candidate(s) with a keep value of exactly 1. Repeat
with the remaining set, and so on until only two are left. This can be used to
elect any number of winners. </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><br></span></p></div></div></blockquote></blockquote><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">2. Multiple
winner method, the uber-open list: issue each voter with two independent ballots,
one for parties, one for candidates. Count each set of votes separately, with
the party vote determining the make-up of the legislature, and the candidate vote
determining which candidates are to fill the seats allocated to each party. Note how even those who didn’t vote for Party
A get to determine who among party A’s candidates will win, hence the uber-open
list. The candidate vote could be SNTV, STV, etc, but I would propose quadratic
voting as best suited given the need to limit adverse behaviour. <span></span></span></p></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 20:56:54 +0200<br>
From: Kristofer Munsterhjelm <<a href="mailto:km-elmet@munsterhjelm.no" target="_blank">km-elmet@munsterhjelm.no</a>><br>
To: EM <<a href="mailto:election-methods@lists.electorama.com" target="_blank">election-methods@lists.electorama.com</a>><br>
Subject: [EM] Request for proposed methods<br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:e7a9f58e-c7e6-85fd-3d8a-09ab565c3677@munsterhjelm.no" target="_blank">e7a9f58e-c7e6-85fd-3d8a-09ab565c3677@munsterhjelm.no</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed<br>
<br>
Lately, I've been updating my Electowiki page, <br>
<a href="https://electowiki.org/wiki/User:Kristomun/Proposed_voting_methods" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://electowiki.org/wiki/User:Kristomun/Proposed_voting_methods</a>. This <br>
page lists various voting methods that aren't described in detail on the <br>
wiki, but have been proposed in either literature or on EM.<br>
<br>
Though I've managed to find a number of methods (including one that <br>
might provide a divisor PR analog of the DPC), I imagine there are still <br>
lots out there that I haven't happened across. So I'd like to ask the <br>
list: do you know any methods that have been proposed or discussed but <br>
that neither have their own Electowiki articles nor are listed on my page?<br>
<br>
-km<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Subject: Digest Footer<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Election-Methods mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Election-Methods@lists.electorama.com" target="_blank">Election-Methods@lists.electorama.com</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.electorama.com/listinfo.cgi/election-methods-electorama.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.electorama.com/listinfo.cgi/election-methods-electorama.com</a><br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
End of Election-Methods Digest, Vol 243, Issue 5<br>
************************************************<br>
</blockquote></div></div></div></div>