<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p><font size="4">Why are we having a public discussion about a
        voting method criterion without anyone giving its definition,
        and with apparently most of the participants in the discussion
        knowing nothing about it besides its name?</font><br>
      <br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://electowiki.org/wiki/Strategy-free_criterion">https://electowiki.org/wiki/Strategy-free_criterion</a><br>
      <br>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <p
style="margin: 0.5em 0px; color: rgb(32, 33, 34); font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial;"><font
            size="4">The<span> </span><b>strategy-free criterion</b><span> </span>is
            a<span> </span><a
              href="https://electowiki.org/wiki/Voting_system_criterion"
              title="Voting system criterion"
style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(51, 102, 204); background: none; overflow-wrap: break-word;">voting
              system criterion</a><span> </span>for evaluating<span> </span><a
              href="https://electowiki.org/wiki/Voting_system"
              class="mw-redirect" title="Voting system"
style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(51, 102, 204); background: none; overflow-wrap: break-word;">voting
              systems</a>.</font></p>
        <h2
style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); margin: 1em 0px 0.25em; padding: 0px; overflow: hidden; border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(162, 169, 177); font-weight: normal; font-family: "Linux Libertine", Georgia, Times, serif; line-height: 1.375; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial;"><font
            size="4"><span class="mw-headline" id="Definitions">Definitions</span></font></h2>
        <p
style="margin: 0.5em 0px; color: rgb(32, 33, 34); font-family: sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial;"><font
            size="4">A sincere vote is one with no falsified preferences
            or preferences left unspecified when the election method
            allows them to be specified (in addition to the preferences
            already specified).</font></p>
        <p
style="margin: 0.5em 0px; color: rgb(32, 33, 34); font-family: sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial;"><font
            size="4">One candidate is preferred over another candidate
            if, in a one-on-one competition, more voters prefer the
            first candidate than prefer the other candidate.</font></p>
        <p
style="margin: 0.5em 0px; color: rgb(32, 33, 34); font-family: sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial;"><font
            size="4">If one candidate is preferred over each of the
            other candidates, that candidate is called "Condorcet
            candidate" or "Condorcet winner".</font></p>
        <h2
style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); margin: 1em 0px 0.25em; padding: 0px; overflow: hidden; border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(162, 169, 177); font-weight: normal; font-family: "Linux Libertine", Georgia, Times, serif; line-height: 1.375; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial;"><font
            size="4"><span class="mw-headline"
              id="Statement_of_criterion">Statement of criterion</span></font></h2>
        <blockquote
style="background: rgb(249, 249, 249); border-left: 4px solid rgb(234, 236, 240); padding: 8px 32px; color: rgb(32, 33, 34); font-family: sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial;">
          <p style="margin: 0px;"><font size="4">If a Condorcet
              candidate exists, and if a majority prefers this candidate
              to another candidate, then the other candidate should not
              win if that majority votes sincerely and no other voter
              falsifies any preferences.</font></p>
        </blockquote>
        <p
style="margin: 0.5em 0px; color: rgb(32, 33, 34); font-family: sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial;"><font
            size="4">In a ranked method, it is nearly equivalent to say:</font></p>
        <blockquote
style="background: rgb(249, 249, 249); border-left: 4px solid rgb(234, 236, 240); padding: 8px 32px; color: rgb(32, 33, 34); font-family: sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; white-space: normal; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial;">
          <p style="margin: 0px;"><font size="4">If more than half of
              the voters rank<span> </span><i>x</i><span> </span>above<span> </span><i>y</i>,
              and there is no candidate<span> </span><i>z</i><span> </span>whom
              more than half of the voters rank above<span> </span><i>x</i>,
              then<span> </span><i>y</i><span> </span>must not be
              elected.</font></p>
        </blockquote>
      </blockquote>
      <font size="4"><br>
        I think this evolved into the Minimal Defense criterion, the
        "votes-only version" of which says that if more than half the
        voters vote A over B and B no higher than equal-bottom then B
        can't win.</font><br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 31/05/2024 9:46 pm, Michael Ossipoff
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAOKDY5Dv7B6ufWg3UUoMpJ1PK-3UgeA2P2ZDJUkG-Ud2+OUNMA@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="auto">Some time ago, I wrote a criterion that I called
        Strategy-Free-Criterion (SFC).</div>
      <div dir="auto"><br>
      </div>
      <div dir="auto">Is that what you were referring to?</div>
      <div dir="auto"><br>
      </div>
      <div dir="auto">It was about a circumstance in which wv Condorcet
        is strategy-free. At that time, autodeterence hadn’t been
        considered.</div>
      <div dir="auto"><br>
      </div>
      <div dir="auto">SFC didn’t catch-on, & I haven’t heard mention
        of it lately, & so I don’t know it’s definition. But wv
        Condorcet is strategy-free in a meaningful sense.</div>
      <div><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">
          <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, May 31, 2024 at
            05:07 Michael Ossipoff <<a
              href="mailto:email9648742@gmail.com"
              moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">email9648742@gmail.com</a>>
            wrote:<br>
          </div>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204)">
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div><br>
              <div class="gmail_quote">
                <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, May 29, 2024
                  at 14:15 Closed Limelike Curves <<a
                    moz-do-not-send="true">closed.limelike.curves@gmail.com</a>> </div>
                <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Ppwrote:<br>
                </div>
                <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204)">
                  <div dir="ltr">
                    <div>I'm trying to work out how the strategy-free
                      criterion actually relates to strategy, because it
                      just sounds like it means the majority-Condorcet
                      criterion ("if a candidate majority-beats every
                      other, they have to win if everyone is honest"). <a
                        class="gmail_plusreply"
id="m_3749243691140155182m_3764866669967271283m_3208403200595893820plusReplyChip-1"
                        moz-do-not-send="true">@Michael Ossipoff</a> ?</div>
                  </div>
                </blockquote>
              </div>
            </div>
            <div dir="auto"> Closed, isn’t “Strategy-Free Criterion”
              your new name for FBC.</div>
            <div dir="auto"><br>
            </div>
            <div dir="auto">It’s a very inaccurate name. FBC-complying
              methods aren’t strategy-free in any sense.</div>
            <div dir="auto"><br>
            </div>
            <div dir="auto"> But they’re free of any need for *drastic*
              defensive strategy (favorite-burial or any defensive
              order-reversal).</div>
            <div dir="auto"><br>
            </div>
            <div dir="auto">You want strategy-free? The wv Condorcet
              methods, such as RP(wv) & MinMax(wv), are
              strategy-free in a meaningful sense…effectively free of
              need for any defensive strategy…due to their
              autodeterence.</div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">----
Election-Methods mailing list - see <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://electorama.com/em">https://electorama.com/em</a> for list info
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>