<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>I am happy with a 2-day extension.</p>
    <p>I think the poll could have been conceived a bit better in the
      first place, taking account of ballot restrictions in the US that
      are fixed or difficult to change.  We could have had parallel
      polls for different ballot types, including those we most like and
      those we might have to put up with.<br>
      <br>
      Chris<br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/05/2024 12:19 pm, Michael
      Ossipoff wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAOKDY5CB-y7K3hZAvxvyZFVV9jcvYJBssZw-jm+RySZCmv2CLw@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">
          <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, May 10, 2024 at
            18:13 Closed Limelike Curves <<a
              href="mailto:closed.limelike.curves@gmail.com"
              moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">closed.limelike.curves@gmail.com</a>>
            wrote:<br>
          </div>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div>
              <div dir="ltr">We could just postpone it.</div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">I suggested a two day extension of the
            voting-deadline.</div>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">I take your suggestion as a second to that
            motion.</div>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div>
              <div dir="ltr">
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div dir="auto">But  in any case I don't know what this
                  poll is supposed to accomplish.</div>
                <div dir="auto">1. The number of methods is so large
                  that everyone's ballot is missing half the methods…</div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">That’s expected. In many-candidate elections,
            people usually won’t rank all of the alternatives. No
            problem. The rankings express their preferences among their
            most preferred.</div>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">It isn’t clear why you perceive that as a
            problem.</div>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div>
              <div dir="ltr">
                <div dir="auto"> I presume on an oversight, because
                  there's just no way people have that strong of an
                  opinion on </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">Meaning unclear. I didn’t expect so many
            nominees. So what. Approval & the Condorcet complying
            methods don’t have a problem with lots of candidates.</div>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div>
              <div dir="ltr">
                <div dir="auto">2. <span
                    style="font-family:-apple-system,helveticaneue">The
                    pairwise matrix is going to end up so degenerate as
                    to be useless.</span></div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">Unsupported statement, unclear in meaning.</div>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div>
              <div dir="ltr">
                <div dir="auto"><span
                    style="font-family:-apple-system,helveticaneue">It'll
                    be full of cycles and ties. </span></div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">Top-cycles for 1st place are quite rare.</div>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">CIVS has done lots of pills with many
            candidate’s, with no problems.</div>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">With many candidates, & successive counts
            among the remaining no winners (to determine the
            finishing-order, the social-ranking), there could be a
            spontaneous sincere cycle somewhere in the finishing-order
            determination. </div>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">Schulze & RP(WC) are regarded by many as
            the best for sincere cycles. …regarded as meeting the most
            criteria with a consensus of importance.</div>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">Closed, when arriving at a forum, the standard
            advice is to listen & ask questions for a while before
            asserting. You’re doing far too much asserting, when you
            should instead be listening & asking.</div>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div>
              <div dir="ltr">
                <div dir="auto"><span
                    style="font-family:-apple-system,helveticaneue"></span></div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div>
              <div dir="ltr">
                <div dir="auto">The number of voters is so small, and
                  the number of outcomes is sufficiently large, that the
                  pairwise matrix is effectively meaningless and
                  dominated by noise. </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">Nonsense. It aggregates the expressed
            pairwise-preferences, to find the CW, the candidate who’d
            beat everything else in 2-way votes.</div>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">In the event of no CW, that absence will be
            shown. …& Schulz & RP(wv) will choose in the best
            accordance with established criteria.</div>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div dir="ltr">
              <div dir="auto"><br>
              </div>
              <div dir="auto"><br>
              </div>
              <div dir="auto">The issue with this poll is it approached
                the topic as a question of voting when it isn't. </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">:-) I don’t know what *your* question is. If
            it’s different, feel free to ask it.</div>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div>
              <div dir="ltr">
                <div dir="auto">Good voting methods aren't always good
                  statistical methods.</div>
                <div dir="auto"><br>
                </div>
                <div dir="auto">If I had cardinal ballots, I could fit a
                  multilevel hierarchical model and possibly get
                  something meaningful out of it. But as is the data
                  here is effectively useless.</div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">As I said, you assert far too much. Whoa,
            we’re getting ahead of ourselves, Cowboy. </div>
          <div dir="auto"><br>
          </div>
          <div dir="auto">You spoke of “noise”. You’re making a nuisance
            noise of yourself.</div>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div>
              <div dir="ltr">
                <div dir="auto"><br>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
            <div>
              <div>
                <div>
                  <div class="gmail_quote">
                    <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, May 10,
                      2024 at 3:10 PM Kristofer Munsterhjelm <<a
                        href="mailto:km_elmet@t-online.de"
                        target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                        class="moz-txt-link-freetext">km_elmet@t-online.de</a>>
                      wrote:<br>
                    </div>
                    <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204)">On
                      2024-05-10 23:49, Toby Pereira wrote:<br>
                      > It probably would have been better to have
                      more warning for the <br>
                      > impending end of the poll. I'm not going to
                      have time to give this a <br>
                      > proper go now. I know it has been referred to
                      previously, but with so <br>
                      > many posts on the topic, it's not that easy
                      to find.<br>
                      <br>
                      That's entirely understandable. Sorry about that;
                      in retrospect I should <br>
                      have posted that earlier.<br>
                      <br>
                      -km<br>
                      ----<br>
                      Election-Methods mailing list - see <a
                        href="https://electorama.com/em"
                        rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://electorama.com/em</a>
                      for list info<br>
                    </blockquote>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
            ----<br>
            Election-Methods mailing list - see <a
              href="https://electorama.com/em" rel="noreferrer"
              target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
              class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://electorama.com/em</a>
            for list info<br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">----
Election-Methods mailing list - see <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://electorama.com/em">https://electorama.com/em</a> for list info
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>