<div dir="auto">That’s what you’re implying when you describe it in terms of “truth.”</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 7:46 PM Richard Lung <<a href="mailto:voting@ukscientists.com">voting@ukscientists.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204)"><u></u>
<div>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>"there’s no one universal set of principles that govern the
perfect electoral system."</p>
<p>Whoever said there was. <br>
</p></div><div>
<p><br>
</p>
<div>On 12/04/2024 15:03, Michael Garman
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="auto">“Truth” is perhaps not the appropriate word here —
there’s no one universal set of principles that govern the
perfect electoral system. <br clear="all">
<br clear="all">
<div>
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">
<p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;color:rgb(34,34,34)"><span>On
Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 3:58 PM Richard Lung <<a href="mailto:voting@ukscientists.com" target="_blank">voting@ukscientists.com</a>>
wrote:</span><br>
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204)">
<div>
<p><br>
</p>
<p> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:16pt;font-family:"Arial Rounded MT Bold"">This
poll, I gather from the unfamiliar sounding names, is
of single-member systems. But there need not be two
classes of election systems, single-member and
multi-member. There are not two truths of electoral
system. There is (one truth) general electoral system</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:16pt;font-family:"Arial Rounded MT Bold"">It
has been believed that the lack of proportional
representation in single-member systems set them
apart. But this is not necessarily the case. It is
possible to have a general election system that works
the same way for single-member systems as multi-member
systems. Indeed (pardon me) I have invented it! The
way it is done is to hold both an election count and
an exclusion count, based on keep values, and average
them, whether in a single or multi-member system.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:16pt;font-family:"Arial Rounded MT Bold"">This
redeems single-member systems for a rational count, as
in multi-member systems. Without this, single-member
systems, unlike multi-member systems, are stuck at a
sub-rational level of accuracy, and are basically
(“last past the post”) elimination counts.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:16pt;font-family:"Arial Rounded MT Bold"">Regards,</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:16pt;font-family:"Arial Rounded MT Bold"">Richard
Lung.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:16pt;font-family:"Arial Rounded MT Bold""><br>
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:16pt;font-family:"Arial Rounded MT Bold""><br>
</span></p>
<div>On 11/04/2024 07:45, Chris Benham wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"> <br>
Have the nominations closed? Not that I want to
nominate another method. <br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<div>
<blockquote type="cite"> <br>
There has been very little electioneering, with I think
most of the nominated methods not even being mentioned.
<br>
<br>
Some haven't even been explained let alone discussed or
promoted. <br>
<br>
When does voting close? <br>
<br>
Chris Benham <br>
<br>
---- <br>
Election-Methods mailing list - see <a href="https://electorama.com/em" target="_blank">https://electorama.com/em</a>
for list info <br>
</blockquote>
</div>
----<br>
Election-Methods mailing list - see <a href="https://electorama.com/em" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://electorama.com/em</a>
for list info<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote></div></div>