<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <p><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <w:WordDocument>
  <w:View>Normal</w:View>
  <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
  <w:Compatibility>
   <w:BreakWrappedTables/>
   <w:SnapToGridInCell/>
   <w:ApplyBreakingRules/>
   <w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
   <w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
   <w:UseFELayout/>
  </w:Compatibility>
  <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
 </w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if !mso]><object
 classid="clsid:38481807-CA0E-42D2-BF39-B33AF135CC4D" id=ieooui></object>
<style>
st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
</style>
<![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
 /* Style Definitions */
 table.MsoNormalTable
        {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
        mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
        mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
        mso-style-noshow:yes;
        mso-style-parent:"";
        mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
        mso-para-margin:0cm;
        mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
        font-size:10.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman";
        mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";}
</style>
<![endif]-->
    </p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:16.0pt;font-family:"Arial Rounded MT Bold"">Proportional
        representation has many election applications, sometimes in flat
        contradiction
        to each other (particularly in the case of the Additrional
        Member System). The
        pursuit of progress thru knowledge (usually called science) says
        that there is
        a right way out of all the wrong ways.</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:16.0pt;font-family:"Arial Rounded MT Bold"">But
        in the past half-century, among reformers, there has been a
        notable
        pussy-footing on the application of the allegedly desired
        principle of
        proportional representation. This would offer a particular
        voting method that
        could be immediately legislated, as an agreed scientific method
        of democratic
        elections.</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:16.0pt;font-family:"Arial Rounded MT Bold"">HG
        Wells explained this over a century ago (in The Elements of
        Reconstruction,
        1916).</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:16.0pt;font-family:"Arial Rounded MT Bold"">Since
        then, vested interests have<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">  </span>muddied
        the
        waters. Some have required a referendum on electoral reform
        (usually to stall
        the democratic method, not the undemocratic methods) which would
        require a
        knowledge of true election method to give a true result.</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:16.0pt;font-family:"Arial Rounded MT Bold"">As
        Wells said, voting method is not a matter of opinion but a
        matter of
        demonstration.</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:16.0pt;font-family:"Arial Rounded MT Bold"">A
        knowledgeable understanding of voting method requires that there
        is one truth,
        to aspire to, not many truths. We don’t follow the kinetic
        theory of vortices,
        from the authority of Descartes. We adhere to the gravity theory
        of </span><span
style="font-size:16.0pt;font-family:"Arial Rounded MT Bold"">Newton</span><span
style="font-size:16.0pt;font-family:"Arial Rounded MT Bold"">,
        because it,
        rather, has been demonstrated to be true.</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:16.0pt;font-family:"Arial Rounded MT Bold"">A
        2024 Welsh commission, a piece of one-party state fluff, asking
        people what
        they want, to tell them what they are going to get, namely a
        closed list
        Parliament, had the gall to call itself “representative
        democracy.”</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:16.0pt;font-family:"Arial Rounded MT Bold"">It
        is the abolition of representative democracy, as the voters are
        not allowed to
        elect representatives, only parties. The academic Laura
        McAllister complained
        this was not the way to go to engaging the public in politics.</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:16.0pt;font-family:"Arial Rounded MT Bold"">About
        1978, Labour, backed by the Liberals, tried an open list, the
        Regional list for
        British Euro-elections, until they were made a fool of, in
        Parliament, by
        having to admit that the “open” list could elect a party list
        candidate with no
        personal votes.</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:16.0pt;font-family:"Arial Rounded MT Bold"">That
        is why, in 1997, upon regaining office, Liberal-backed New
        Labour straight away
        passed an edict for a closed list to British Euro-elections. (A
        Labour leader
        of a Metropolitan Council commented, on BBC Panorama: We don’t
        have much say in
        the Labour Party.)</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:16.0pt;font-family:"Arial Rounded MT Bold"">Regards,</span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:16.0pt;font-family:"Arial Rounded MT Bold"">Richard
        Lung. <br>
      </span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:16.0pt;font-family:"Arial Rounded MT Bold""><br>
      </span></p>
    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:16.0pt;font-family:"Arial Rounded MT Bold""><br>
      </span></p>
  </body>
</html>