<div><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I looked at the St. Louis wording, & it was much briefer. I wanted to try to spell things out.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I included results-reporting because I feel that’s important.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Saint Louis has a runoff. I propose it without one. A runoff loses FBC compliance, & invites some offensive-strategies.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I didn’t say “no runoff”, but that’s implied when I said to elect the candidate who got the most approvals.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I haven’t checked the Fargo wording yet. Has the ND legislature’s ban on Approval been overturned?</div><div dir="auto"><br><div class="gmail_quote" dir="auto"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 16:48 KenB <<a href="mailto:kdbearman@gmail.com">kdbearman@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204)">How does your proposed wording compare to the ordinances that Fargo ND <br>
and St. Louis MO actually have?<br>
- Ken Bearman, Minneapolis MN<br>
<br>
<br>
On 1/25/2024 3:46 PM, Michael Ossipoff wrote:<br>
<br>
> Proposed wording for city Approval-Voting statute:<br>
><br>
> …<br>
><br>
> Approval-Voting Statute:<br>
><br>
> …<br>
><br>
> Voting:<br>
><br>
> …<br>
><br>
> In every election for electing a single-winner to a single-seat office <br>
> in this city:<br>
><br>
> …<br>
><br>
> Each voter shall be allowed to Approve(i.e. vote for, mark) as many <br>
> candidates as s/he wishes to on the ballot. Each candidate’s votes <br>
> shall be summed over all the ballots, & the candidate receiving the <br>
> most votes shall be declared winner & is elected to that office.<br>
> …<br>
> Implementation:<br>
><br>
> …<br>
><br>
> Count-software:<br>
><br>
> …<br>
><br>
> The count-software code for detecting & disallowing “over-votes” <br>
> (votes for more than one candidate on a ballot) shall be deleted.<br>
><br>
> …<br>
><br>
> The ballot’s voting-instruction:<br>
><br>
> …<br>
><br>
> The ballot’s voting-instruction shall be changed from “Vote for 1 <br>
> candidate” to “Vote for 1 or more candidates”.<br>
> …<br>
> Election-results reporting:<br>
><br>
> …<br>
><br>
> The following election results shall be reported by the elections <br>
> department, & made available to local media, & displayed on the <br>
> official county website, & made available on paper at the <br>
> elections-department office:<br>
><br>
> …<br>
><br>
> 1. The winner<br>
><br>
> …<br>
><br>
> 2. The vote-total of every candidate<br>
><br>
> …<br>
><br>
> 3: The following information:<br>
><br>
> …<br>
><br>
> Where N = either 4 or 5 or 6:<br>
><br>
> …<br>
><br>
> For the N top vote-receiving candidates:<br>
><br>
> …<br>
><br>
> The percentage of the ballots that exemplify each one of the 2^N <br>
> possible ways of approving & not approving those N candidates.<br>
><br>
><br>
> ----<br>
> Election-Methods mailing list - see <a href="https://electorama.com/em" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://electorama.com/em</a> for list info<br>
----<br>
Election-Methods mailing list - see <a href="https://electorama.com/em" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://electorama.com/em</a> for list info<br>
</blockquote></div></div>