<html><head></head><body><div class="ydpbf45127ayahoo-style-wrap" style="font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;"><div></div>
<div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">I wasn't referring to the Condorcet Jury Theorem. I was referring to the fact that there's no way that you can consistently define society's preference in a way that you can determine whether society prefers A or B by looking at the pairwise comparison. (Because of the possibility of cycles.)</div><div><br></div>
</div><div id="ydp148eb332yahoo_quoted_2200132357" class="ydp148eb332yahoo_quoted">
<div style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:#26282a;">
<div>
On Monday, 14 August 2023 at 00:14:16 BST, Kristofer Munsterhjelm <km_elmet@t-online.de> wrote:
</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><div dir="ltr">On 8/14/23 00:33, Toby Pereira wrote:<br clear="none">> To be clearer I should have said "logical impossibility" rather than <br clear="none">> "logical fallacy".<br clear="none"><br clear="none">Is it a logical impossibility, though? The Condorcet jury theorem may be <br clear="none">unrealistic, but it's not a self-evident contradiction.<div class="ydp148eb332yqt9332482924" id="ydp148eb332yqtfd11691"><br clear="none"><br clear="none">-km<br clear="none"></div></div></div>
</div>
</div></body></html>