<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Hello Andy,</p>
<p>these are my free 2 booklets and one book on binomial stv,
varying from about 1500 words to 50,000 words. Tho only part two
of the book, describes the (almost) complete working.</p>
<p>RL.<br>
</p>
<p><a href="https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/1111349">Smashwords
– Elect and Exclude. Binomial STV Hand Count Basics – a book by
Richard Lung</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/1106292">Smashwords
– The Super-Vote Supercharged: Binomial STV elections Hand Count
– a book by Richard Lung</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/806030">Smashwords
– FAB STV: Four Averages Binomial Single Transferable Vote. – a
book by Richard Lung</a></p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 21/05/2022 18:25, Andy Dienes wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CALcqqeubWcyrWAp7zOY64nmCA-Bt1ELwt+wOXM74PV_gWW4QbQ@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">Hi Richard,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I, too, have had a hard time understanding exactly what are
the mechanics of Binomial STV. I have read your full posts,
and I think it would clear it up for me if you would indeed
give a "shut up and calculate" worked example of the type that
Kristofer has sent. Please, without the philosophy and
motivation for the method interspersed, just walk through the
calculation of winners for Binomial STV the same way a
computer program would.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-Andy</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 3:57
AM Richard Lung <<a href="mailto:voting@ukscientists.com"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">voting@ukscientists.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Thank
you, Kristofer,<br>
<br>
I refer you to the post as a whole, not just the first couple
of lines, <br>
for my answer.<br>
<br>
It's not just a matter of "shut up and calculate" to quote a
famous <br>
grouse of hapless quantum theory students.<br>
<br>
(You make me suspect you are an instructor. However, I
appreciate your <br>
consideration and competance.)<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
Richard Lung.<br>
<br>
<br>
On 16/05/2022 10:13, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:<br>
> On 16.05.2022 08:20, Richard Lung wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Binomial STV is later no harm, unlike Borda count,
because uses keep<br>
>> values , equivalent to Gregory method, for both
election and exclusion<br>
>> counts.<br>
> I would like to check that for myself. That's why I've
asked (three<br>
> times) if you could give me the concrete keep and exclude
values, and<br>
> the winners, for particular example elections involving
truncation.<br>
><br>
> Could you please do that?<br>
><br>
> -km<br>
----<br>
Election-Methods mailing list - see <a
href="https://electorama.com/em" rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://electorama.com/em</a>
for list info<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>