<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><font size="4">Dea All, <br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="4">There is so much disagreement on a subject when
not much is known about it; it hasn't advanced much as a
science. Everyone thinks they are an expert, because they vote.
I thought so. Most scientific improvements came in the 19th
century, from mathematicians developing the Hare system. STV
(IMO) the best system perhaps only had one significant
improvement in the 20th century (Meek method).<br>
An outstanding problem with all the worlds elections is that
they don't have rational counts. This is what PR campaigns are
essentially all about.. FPTP is not a rational election. But no
voting methods have a rational exclusion count, as well as a
rational election count. All the worlds voting systems are at
best half rational.</font></p>
<p><font size="4"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/1111349">https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/1111349</a></font></p>
<p><font size="4"><br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="4">Regards,</font></p>
<p><font size="4">Richard Lung.</font></p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>