<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} </style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div id="appendonsend"></div>
<hr tabindex="-1" style="display:inline-block; width:98%">
Am I correct in concluding that in contrast to every other form of single-winner method (Plurality, IRV, Condorcet, Score, and Approval), only Majority Judgment (MJ) always guarantees the election of the candidate among at least 3 who has received at least
50% plus one of all the votes (grades) cast by citizens of acceptable or above? Also in contrast, MJ always achieves this monotonic result both independent of irrelevant alternative candidates (IIAC), and without ever having to use an arbitrary method to resolve
ties.
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div style="font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:14pt; color:rgb(0,0,0)">
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-bottom:0.1in; line-height:115%; background:transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-bottom:0.1in; background:transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; margin-bottom:0in; line-height:100%">
What do you think?</p>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>