<div dir="ltr"><div>>Thanks a lot!<br>Glad to help! :)<br><br>>More of us should post stuff like this.<br>Well, in the meantime, have a new preprint, on the same topics, published to aRxiv on Monday:<br><a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.09346">https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.09346</a> - "Representing the Insincere: Strategically Robust Proportional Representation"<br><br></div><div>Kind regards,<br><br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 29 January 2018 at 16:09, Jameson Quinn <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jameson.quinn@gmail.com" target="_blank">jameson.quinn@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Thanks a lot! More of us should post stuff like this.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div class="gmail-h5">2018-01-29 8:43 GMT-05:00 Arthur Wist <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:arthur.wist@gmail.com" target="_blank">arthur.wist@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br></div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div class="gmail-h5"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>Hello,<br><br></div>Sorry in advanced for the huge load of information all at once, but I think you'll highly likely find the following quite interesting:<br><br>On how people misunderstood the Duggan-Schwartz theorem:<br><a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.07105" target="_blank">https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.071<wbr>05</a> - Two statements of the Duggan-Schwartz theorem<br><a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.07102" target="_blank">https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.071<wbr>02</a> -  Manipulability of consular election rules<br><br>EVERYTHING here:<br><a href="https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ssb0yjUAAAAJ&sortby=pubdate" target="_blank">https://scholar.google.com/cit<wbr>ations?user=ssb0yjUAAAAJ&sortb<wbr>y=pubdate</a><br><br>Some key highlights from that last link above:<br><br><a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.07580" target="_blank">https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.075<wbr>80</a> - Achieving Proportional Representation via Voting [ On which a blog post exists: <a href="https://medium.com/@haris.aziz/achieving-proportional-representation-2d741871e78" target="_blank">https://medium.com/@haris.aziz<wbr>/achieving-proportional-repres<wbr>entation-2d741871e78</a>. Better than STV and STV derivatives in all criteria? You decide! ]<br><br><a href="http://materials.dagstuhl.de/files/17/17261/17261.HarisAziz.Slides.pdf" target="_blank">http://materials.dagstuhl.de/f<wbr>iles/17/17261/17261.HarisAziz.<wbr>Slides.pdf</a> - Proportional Representation in Approval-based Voting and Beyond. [This is a presentation - and it's outdated by now, albeit it's only from Summer last year.]<br><a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.10415" target="_blank"><br>https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.104<wbr>15</a> - A polynomial-time algorithm to achieve extended justified representation<br><br><a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.06030" target="_blank">https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.060<wbr>30</a> - Sub-committee Approval Voting and Generalised Justified Representation Axiom [This generalizes large parts of the mathematics of voting theory!]<br><br>And on the topic of committees, not quite from election science, but relevant nonetheless:<br><br><a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0804.2202" target="_blank">https://arxiv.org/abs/0804.220<wbr>2</a> -  To how many politicians should government be left? [With a p-value of =<10^-6. And no, that's NOT a typo.]<br><a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0808.1684" target="_blank">https://arxiv.org/abs/0808.168<wbr>4</a> - Parkinson's Law Quantified: Three Investigations on Bureaucratic Inefficiency<br><br>The above two papers got a bit of news & blog coverage back in the day:<br><br><a href="http://old.themoscowtimes.com/article/business-in-brief/article/austrians-suggest-small-is-better/article/austrians-suggest-small-is-better/362667.html" target="_blank">http://old.themoscowtimes.com/<wbr>article/business-in-brief/arti<wbr>cle/austrians-suggest-small-<wbr>is-better/article/austrians-<wbr>suggest-small-is-better/<wbr>362667.html</a><br><br><a href="http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2008/apr/27/physicists-quantify-the-coefficient-of-inefficiency" target="_blank">http://physicsworld.com/cws/ar<wbr>ticle/news/2008/apr/27/physici<wbr>sts-quantify-the-coefficient-<wbr>of-inefficiency</a><br><br><a href="https://www.nature.com/news/2008/080822/full/news.2008.1050.html" target="_blank">https://www.nature.com/news/20<wbr>08/080822/full/news.2008.1050.<wbr>html</a><br><br><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/4221839/Eight-people-on-committee-leads-to-decision-deadlock-scientists-say.html" target="_blank">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new<wbr>s/science/4221839/Eight-people<wbr>-on-committee-leads-to-decisio<wbr>n-deadlock-scientists-say.html</a><br><br><a href="https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/numbers-up-for-unlucky-eight-nnt5js8jdvm" target="_blank">https://www.thetimes.co.uk/art<wbr>icle/numbers-up-for-unlucky-<wbr>eight-nnt5js8jdvm</a><br><br><a href="https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126902.200-editorial-parkinsons-law-is-alive-and-well/" target="_blank">https://www.newscientist.com/a<wbr>rticle/mg20126902.200-editoria<wbr>l-parkinsons-law-is-alive-and-<wbr>well/</a><br><br><a href="https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126901.300-explaining-the-curse-of-work/?full=true" target="_blank">https://www.newscientist.com/a<wbr>rticle/mg20126901.300-explaini<wbr>ng-the-curse-of-work/?full=<wbr>true</a><br><br><br></div>Kind regards,<br><br><br></div><br></div>
<br></div></div>----<br>
Election-Methods mailing list - see <a href="http://electorama.com/em" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://electorama.com/em</a> for list info<br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>