<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div><span>Does anyone understand why the DH3 concept exists? Why envision three major blocs, instead of two major blocs plus the small bloc belonging</span></div><div><span>to the pawn candidate? That doesn't require four candidates and more closely resembles how burial problems are usually considered...<br></span></div><div><br><span></span></div><div><span>Kevin<br></span></div><div><br></div> <div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"> <div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"> <div dir="ltr"> <font face="Arial" size="2"> <hr size="1"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">De :</span></b> Kristofer Munsterhjelm <km_elmet@lavabit.com><br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">À :</span></b> Jameson Quinn
<jameson.quinn@gmail.com> <br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Cc :</span></b> MIKE OSSIPOFF <nkklrp@hotmail.com>; election-methods@electorama.com <br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Envoyé le :</span></b> Dimanche 19 février 2012 7h48<br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Objet :</span></b> Re: [EM] Conditionality-by-top-count probably violates FBC<br> </font> </div> <br>On 02/15/2012 06:08 PM, Jameson Quinn wrote:<br>> But conditionality-by-mutuality violates later-no-help, and as such,<br>> raises the spectre of a DH3 <<a href="http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/DH3" target="_blank">http://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/DH3</a>>-like<br>> scenario.<br><br>I think you can have burial in methods that pass LNHelp too, unless the method also passes LNHarm. LNHelp-complying methods could still reward a move from, say, A>B>C to A>C>B (where the point would be to keep B from winning more than to get A to
win).<br><br>See, for instance, Kevin Venzke's post: <a href="http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2011-February/027098.html" target="_blank">http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2011-February/027098.html</a> , or James Green-Armytage's: <a href="http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2011-February/027091.html" target="_blank">http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2011-February/027091.html</a><br><br> </div> </div> </div></body></html>