<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>
Chris--<br><br>I'll describe Forest's proposal briefly:<br><br>It's minmax margins (but it's defined as maxmin, with respect to x>y - y>x), <br>looking at all pairwise comparisons, rather than just at defeats.<br><br>But, instead of just x>y - y>x, it's x top or >y - y>x. <br><br>As I said in my other posting, it seems to have the same properties<br>as MMT. In other words, FBC, LNHa, 3P, and the (unnecessary) Mono-Add-Plump<br>and the (unnecessary) avoidance of electing C in Kevin's MMPO "bad"-example.<br><br>Though Mono-Add-Plump and complying in Kevin's example are unnecessary,<br>they avoid misguided or dishonest criticism by opponents of a reform proposal.<br><br>As I've said, maybe it's better to ask for a little less than MMPO and MDDTR,<br>in order to avoid the distraction that such criticisms could cause, during an<br>enactment campaign. --especially given that the opponents are likely to have<br>a lot more media money than the proponents.<br><br>Mike Ossipoff<br><br> </div></body>
</html>