<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><div>On Aug 14, 2011, at 6:51 PM, Dave Ketchum wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: 'Lucida Bright'; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; "><div>Why transfers?</div><div><br></div><div>At least, when I said do a CW type search for the strongest remaining candidate, I thought of this as adequate without transfers. I do think of quitting if the remainder are too weak:</div><div>. Anyway, quit after filling the limit of seats to fill.</div><div>. Quit anyway if remainder are too weak to deserve a seat.</div></span><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"></blockquote></div><br><div>I'm not really following what you mean by "strongest remaining candidate".</div><div><br></div></body></html>