<div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
</blockquote></div>
Letting loose can be very difficult - but many of us are urging FairVote to swallow the bitter pill.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I manned phones, made donations to FairVote, and voted, to help pass IRV in San Francisco. And I now, personally, think that IRV is considerably worse than most systems besides plurality and Borda - including Range, Bucklin, Approval, and a wide variety of Condorcet systems.</div>
<div><br></div><div>But I'm not asking FairVote to "swallow the bitter pill". I think you have every right to continue promoting IRV, if that's what you believe in. I'm just asking you what I've always asked, since the time when I still counted myself as one of your strongest supporters: that you be honest and open about it. That means 3 things:</div>
<div><br></div><div>1. Don't denigrate other solutions to problems you acknowledge. In fact, I think you should support them. That means that whenever comparing IRV to another reform proposal, make it clear from the outset that the other proposal is superior to plurality (except in the <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">very</span> rare cases where it isn't).</div>
<div>2. Don't lie about the benefits of IRV. For instance, unless full ranking is mandatory, IRV does not guarantee a majority. You could say instead that it "does a better job of getting a majority" than plurality, or whatever.</div>
<div>3. Be open to dialogue with other voting reformers. For instance, don't turn off comments on all your blogs and HuffPost pieces, and don't moderate out relevant but critical posts on the instantrunoff mailing list. I know that it hurts, because there are definitely people with much more of an animus against IRV than I have, but the problems in running away from dialogue are worse.</div>
<div><br></div><div>With respect,</div><div>Jameson Quinn</div></div>