<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><DIV>Kristofer,</DIV>
<DIV>Woodall's DAC and DSC and Bucklin and Woodall's similar QLTD</DIV>
<DIV>all meet mono-raise and Mutual Majority (aka Majority for Solid Coalitions).</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>DSC meets LNHarm and the rest meet LNHelp.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Chris Benham</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG>Kristofer Munsterhjelm</STRONG> wrote (Sun.Dec.21):<BR><snip></DIV>
<DIV>In any case, it may be possible to have one of the LNHs and be monotonic <BR>and have mutual majority. I'm not sure, but perhaps (doesn't one of DAC <BR>or DSC do this?). If so, it would be possible to see (at least) whether <BR>people strategize in the direction of early truncation by looking at <BR>methods that fail LNHarm but pass LNHelp; that is, Bucklin.<BR><snip></DIV></div><br>
<hr size=1>
Stay connected to the people that matter most with a smarter inbox. <a href="http://au.rd.yahoo.com/galaxy/mail/tagline2/*http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/smarterinbox" target=_blank>Take a look</a>.</body></html>