<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><DIV>I don't see antiplurality as much worse than FPP.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Antiplurality (vote against one, candidate with fewest votes wins) meets</DIV>
<DIV>Majority Loser and Strong Favourite Betrayal.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Very bad is the Supplementary Vote used to elect some mayors in the </DIV>
<DIV>UK. It is like the Contingent Vote (one trip to the polls TTR) except</DIV>
<DIV>voters are only allowed to rank 2 candidates.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Borda Voting is also very bad. It fails Majority Favourite and "Rich Party"</DIV>
<DIV>(meaning that it fails Clone-Loser in a way that advantages factions who field</DIV>
<DIV>more candidates).<BR></DIV>
<DIV>Chris Benham</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG>Greg Nisbet</STRONG> wrote:<BR>What is the worst voting method of all time?<BR><BR>I suggest methods already made up<BR><BR>I suggest antiplurality, if that doesn't count, then... hmmm... North<BR>Carolina's weird version of IRV.<BR><A href="http://www.fairvote.org/irv/?page=21&articlemode=showspecific&showarticle=2229"><FONT color=#0000ff>http://www.fairvote.org/irv/?page=21&articlemode=showspecific&showarticle=2229</FONT></A><BR><BR>40% to win? 40%?! WHY?<BR></DIV></div><br>
<hr size=1> Make the switch to the world's best email.
<a href="http://au.rd.yahoo.com/mail/taglines/au/mail/default/*http://au.yahoo.com/y7mail">Get Yahoo!7 Mail</a>.</body></html>