<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">
Ok, probably the guild was right in maintaining citizens' trust on the system. People may do whatever they wish with their apartments but locksmiths should gain trust by staying neutral.<div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><div>Juho</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><div><br><div><div>On Dec 26, 2007, at 22:48 , rob brown wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">On Dec 26, 2007 12:03 PM, Juho <<a href="mailto:juho4880@yahoo.co.uk">juho4880@yahoo.co.uk</a>> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Maybe the new proposal of the locksmith would have been to install<br>new apartment specific locks on the inner doors of the vestibules.<br>That would leave the vestibules open for more balanced and more<br>voluntary social trials. :-) <br></blockquote><div><br>Sadly that won't be possible, as the locksmith was dismissed from the locksmiths guild and forbidden to practice. Turns out that according to their bylaws, the number one rule of locksmithing is "never attempt to make the case that the concept of private property is overrated." <br></div></div><br><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; ">----</div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; ">Election-Methods mailing list - see <a href="http://electorama.com/em">http://electorama.com/em</a> for list info</div> </blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>