<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7226.0">
<TITLE>[Condorcet] Re: why the Schulze Method is a Better Proposal</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV id=idOWAReplyText27160 dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>Somehow this message didn't
pass muster for the Condorcet list.</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><BR>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> Simmons, Forest <BR><B>Sent:</B> Wed
9/28/2005 2:31 PM<BR><B>To:</B> Condorcet@yahoogroups.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE:
[Condorcet] Re: why the Schulze Method is a Better Proposal<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV id=idOWAReplyText66944 dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT size=2>Jeff wrote ...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT size=2>> [ Note: Voters will execute almost the same
ballot regardless of what<BR>> ranked voting method we choose. -- JRF
]<BR><BR>Forest replies: </FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT size=2>If voters are going to rank the candidates
without regard for the method, then there is no gratuitous
approval problem in the implicit approval version of
DMC.</DIV></FONT></DIV></DIV>
</BODY>
</HTML>