[EM] Measures of Compactness

Andrew B Jennings (elections) elections at jenningsstory.com
Sun Sep 21 16:15:55 PDT 2025


I'm a supporter of defining compactness and then using a districting map that optimizes it. Brian Olson (bdistricting.com/about.html) has always advocated that:

> The best district map is the one where people have the lowest average distance to the center of their district.

But what about using the square of the distance? Mathematically, it makes so many square roots disappear that the problem might be much more tractable.

It also seems that minimizing the sum of squares of distances from each voter to the (population-weighted) centroid of their district and minimizing the sum of squares of distances between each pair of voters in the same district is practically the same problem (at least on the plane). That seems nice.

I have some friends who actually want to propose redistricting our city mathematically. Is it worth using the square of the distance?

I have done some maps minimizing the sum of the distances (and squares of distances) between all pairs of voters in the same district. They look pretty similar, at least for my city.

~ Andy Jennings
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20250921/40fa3287/attachment.htm>


More information about the Election-Methods mailing list