[EM] POLL: Ballots and results
Michael Ossipoff
email9648742 at gmail.com
Fri May 17 18:50:49 PDT 2024
In the 11 ballots initially posted, doesn’t Benham pairbeat RP 6 to 5? …
unless I made the same miscount twice.
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 16:36 Kristofer Munsterhjelm <km_elmet at t-online.de>
wrote:
> Here are the ballots in EM format:
>
> 1: Approval > STAR > ApprovalRunoff > Benham = SchwartzWoodall = Woodall
> > RankedPairs > Minmax > SmithApprovalImplicit > Schulze > Baldwin =
> CondorcetBorda = CopelandBorda = DoubleDefeatHare = MSA = MSMLV = MSTB =
> Raynaud = RCIPE = SmithApprovalExplicit = SmithDAC = SmithScore > MJ >
> IRV > Plurality
> 1: IRV > STAR > ApprovalRunoff > Approval > Baldwin = Benham =
> CondorcetBorda = CopelandBorda = DoubleDefeatHare = Minmax = MJ = MSA =
> MSMLV = MSTB = RankedPairs = Raynaud = RCIPE = Schulze = SchwartzWoodall
> = SmithApprovalExplicit = SmithApprovalImplicit = SmithDAC = SmithScore
> = Woodall > Plurality
> 1: MSA > SmithApprovalExplicit = SmithApprovalImplicit = IRV = Benham =
> DoubleDefeatHare > RankedPairs = Schulze > Approval > Minmax > Baldwin =
> CondorcetBorda = CopelandBorda = MSMLV = MSTB = Raynaud = RCIPE =
> SchwartzWoodall = SmithDAC = SmithScore = Woodall > MJ > STAR =
> ApprovalRunoff = Plurality
> 1: Approval > RankedPairs > STAR > Woodall > SmithDAC > Minmax > RCIPE >
> Benham > MSA > SmithApprovalExplicit > ApprovalRunoff > MSMLV >
> SmithApprovalImplicit > DoubleDefeatHare > Raynaud > Schulze >
> SchwartzWoodall > SmithScore > MJ > Plurality > IRV > CondorcetBorda >
> Baldwin > CopelandBorda
> 1: STAR > SmithScore > Baldwin = Benham = CondorcetBorda = CopelandBorda
> = Raynaud = Minmax = RankedPairs = Schulze = SchwartzWoodall =
> SmithApprovalExplicit = SmithApprovalImplicit = SmithDAC = Woodall = MSA
> = MSMLV = MSTB > ApprovalRunoff > Approval > RCIPE > DoubleDefeatHare >
> MJ > IRV > Plurality
> 1: RankedPairs > Schulze = Benham > Woodall > Minmax > SchwartzWoodall >
> SmithApprovalImplicit = SmithApprovalExplicit > SmithScore > Raynaud >
> Baldwin > MJ > DoubleDefeatHare = MSTB = MSMLV = MSA > CopelandBorda >
> SmithDAC > ApprovalRunoff > STAR > RCIPE > CondorcetBorda > Approval >
> IRV > Plurality
> 1: CondorcetPlur > Minmax > RankedPairs > Schulze > BTRIRV > Baldwin =
> Benham = CondorcetBorda = CopelandBorda = MSA = MSMLV = MSTB = Raynaud =
> SchwartzWoodall = SmithApprovalExplicit = SmithApprovalImplicit =
> SmithDAC = SmithScore = Woodall > IRV > Approval > STAR > Plurality > Score
> 1: RCIPE > Benham > Minmax > RankedPairs > Woodall > SchwartzWoodall >
> Baldwin > CopelandBorda > CondorcetBorda > Schulze > SmithScore >
> Raynaud > MSTB > MSMLV > SmithDAC > DoubleDefeatHare > IRV > MJ > STAR >
> Approval > MSA > SmithApprovalExplicit > SmithApprovalImplicit >
> Plurality > ApprovalRunoff
> 1: Approval > SmithScore > MSA > SmithApprovalExplicit > RankedPairs >
> Benham > Minmax > STAR > ApprovalRunoff = Baldwin = CondorcetBorda =
> CopelandBorda = DoubleDefeatHare = IRV = MJ = MSMLV = MSTB = Raynaud =
> RCIPE = Schulze = SchwartzWoodall = SmithApprovalImplicit = SmithDAC =
> Woodall > Plurality
> 1: STAR > SmithScore > Score > MJ > Approval = SmithApprovalExplicit =
> SmithApprovalImplicit = MSA > ApprovalRunoff = RankedPairs = Schulze >
> Baldwin = Benham = CopelandBorda = MSMLV = MSTB = Raynaud =
> SchwartzWoodall = SmithDAC = Woodall > CondorcetBorda = Minmax > RCIPE >
> IRV > Plurality
> 1: Benham > SchwartzWoodall > Woodall > RankedPairs > Schulze > MSTB >
> Minmax > BTRIRV > Raynaud > Baldwin > RCIPE > IRV > SmithDAC > MSMLV >
> MSA > SmithApprovalExplicit > SmithApprovalImplicit > SmithScore >
> DoubleDefeatHare > CopelandBorda > CondorcetBorda > Approval > MJ >
> Score > ApprovalRunoff > STAR > Plurality > Borda
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Ranked Pairs is the CW -- and Benham beats everybody but Ranked Pairs
> pairwise. This can be verified by going to Rob LeGrand's calculator
> (http://www.cs.angelo.edu/~rlegrand/rbvote/calc.html with mirror
> https://munsterhjelm.no/km/rbvote/calc.html for people outside the US)
> and selecting "calculate all winners".
>
> Here are the Schulze results:
>
> 1 Ranked Pairs (wv)
> 2 Benham
> 3 Approval
> Minmax (wv)
> Schulze
> STAR
> 7 Smith//Score
> 8 Margins-Sorted Approval
> Schwartz Woodall
> Smith//Approval (implicit)
> Woodall
> 12 Smith//Approval (explicit)
> 13 Raynaud
> 14 Baldwin
> 15 Max Strength Transitive Beatpath
> 16 Margins-Sorted Minimum Losing Votes
> Smith//DAC
> 18 Copeland//Borda (Ranked Robin)
> 19 Condorcet//Borda (Black)
> 20 Approval with manual runoff
> Double Defeat, Hare
> RCIPE
> 23 Majority Judgement
> 24 IRV
> 25 Plurality
> 26 BTR-IRV (write-in)
> 27 Score (write-in)
> 28 Borda (write-in)
> Condorcet//Plurality (write-in)
>
> The Approval voting results:
>
> 1 Ranked Pairs (wv)
> 2 Minmax (wv)
> 3 Benham
> STAR
> Woodall
> 6 Approval
> 7 Approval with manual runoff
> Margins-Sorted Approval
> Schulze
> 10 Schwartz Woodall
> Smith//Approval (explicit)
> Smith//Approval (implicit)
> Smith//Score
> 14 Baldwin
> BTR-IRV (write-in)
> Condorcet//Borda (Black)
> Condorcet//Plurality (write-in)
> Copeland//Borda (Ranked Robin)
> Double Defeat, Hare
> IRV
> Majority Judgement
> Margins-Sorted Minimum Losing Votes
> Max Strength Transitive Beatpath
> Raynaud
> RCIPE
> Score (write-in)
> Smith//DAC
> 28 Borda (write-in)
> Plurality
>
> and for fun, Schulze with ties broken by Approval:
>
> 1 Ranked Pairs (wv)
> 2 Benham
> 3 Minmax (wv)
> 4 STAR
> 5 Approval
> 6 Schulze
> 7 Smith//Score
> 8 Woodall
> 9 Margins-Sorted Approval
> 10 Schwartz Woodall
> Smith//Approval (implicit)
> 12 Smith//Approval (explicit)
> 13 Raynaud
> 14 Baldwin
> 15 Max Strength Transitive Beatpath
> 16 Margins-Sorted Minimum Losing Votes
> Smith//DAC
> 18 Copeland//Borda (Ranked Robin)
> 19 Condorcet//Borda (Black)
> 20 Approval with manual runoff
> 21 Double Defeat, Hare
> RCIPE
> 23 Majority Judgement
> 24 IRV
> 25 Plurality
> 26 BTR-IRV (write-in)
> 27 Score (write-in)
> 28 Condorcet//Plurality (write-in)
> 29 Borda (write-in)
>
> This should be accurate, but if you spot a typo or other mistake
> somewhere, let me know.
>
> -km
> ----
> Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for list
> info
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20240517/178dd9df/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list