[EM] "Double Defeat, Hare" poll candidate

[Michael Garman]

You asked for people to push back if we disagreed, so I did. That’s not
contrarianism for its own sake. If you can’t take the heat…

Michael J. Garman | he/him

Digital & Campus Organizer | Rank the Vote

Book a meeting with me! <https://calendly.com/michael-j-garman>

(401) 644-4108 | michael.garman at rankthevote.us


On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 8:25 PM Michael Ossipoff <email9648742 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Argumentative for its own sake about the poll.
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 11:21 Michael Garman <
> michael.garman at rankthevote.us> wrote:
>
>> I’m also curious where I’ve been a “contrarian for its own sake.” My
>> ideas might not be common on here, but I’ve been consistent in what I
>> support and advocate for.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 8:12 PM robert bristow-johnson <
>> rbj at audioimagination.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Michael Ossipoff wrote:
>>> > I was discouraged when It seemed like Garman’s & Robert’s
>>> contrarinesses-for-its own-sake was the state-of affairs.
>>>
>>> When have I ever been a "contrarian-for-its-own-sake"?
>>>
>>> I am a Condorcet partisan (regarding single-winner elections).
>>>
>>> I have good reasons for being an exclusive Condorcet partisan.  I am and
>>> have been completely consistent about it.  If I am contradicting someone
>>> here, it's likely only motivated by that.
>>> ----
>>> Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for list
>>> info
>>>
>> ----
>> Election-Methods mailing list - see https://electorama.com/em for list
>> info
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/attachments/20240417/27832e20/attachment-0001.htm>