[EM] non-transferable voting is defective
Richard Lung
voting at ukscientists.com
Sun Apr 14 00:14:24 PDT 2024
The reason to believe non-transferable voting is defective comes from HG
Wells, and I fully agree with it. It seems someone here doesn't.
Paraphrasing, Wells said, whenever the simple and obvious method of a
single non-transferable vote is used, elections divide into two
antagonistic factions, describing modern Anglo-American politics
perfectly, and also, for that matter, the party-list world, which
generally forms two coalitions of left versus right, from a leading
party list with some 20% or 30+% of the votes.
The voting systems of the world are a politicians-made anarchic
self-seeking shambles.
Regards,
Richard Lung.
More information about the Election-Methods
mailing list